Disabled packages with links, like:
disabled_package_01
disabled_package_02
disabled_package_03
new_package_04
disabled_package_04
disabled_package_05
new_package_01
new_package_02
new_package_03
The new links was NOT put into disabled/hidden packages, the new links put into a completely new package, there was no matching disabled/hidden package. I'm sure because the packages names contain date information.
So, it looks it just randomly put into the middle of old, disabled packages.
It just doesn't make sense to insert brand-new packages into the middle of nowhere, so to speak.
If, for some weird reason, the linkgrabber/packager finds that a pretty old package is a good candidate for putting the links into it, what would happen if the target disabled/hidden anyway?
Thanks in advance,
M
|