LOL, you mean you guys aren't omniscient???
I wasn't really expecting more than the fix that has already been propogated (see my post #10 above); and thank you for that. But, I also wasn't sure myself where the last part of the filename was getting lost, or if imgchili kept a recoverable record of the filename.
I am curious though: the fix that was made simply stops the stripping of the numeric prefix, which does solve the problem. But before that, when JD was stripping off the prefix it also seemed to recognize that each file had different size, so why didn't it rename instead of mark as a dupe?
|