JD team.

Thanks for all your efforts.

I thought that the goal in resolving this problem was to bypass downloads where a file of the same name exists in the download directory without querying the hosting service. That problem is not fixed.

If the file already exists then querying the hosting service in unnecessary and and that unnecessary step caused the problem i described in my earlier post.

I understand the the design of JD2 has been greatly improved by having a more sophisticated ways of detecting duplicate files and mirrors. The implementation is creating problems and is still worthy of a bug report.