#1
|
|||
|
|||
Im very disappointed with jd2
some JD team told me to use JD2 to improve stored much effective
http://board.jdownloader.org/showthread.php?t=44811 jd2 log jdlog://1360114490988 im already download 80% of filesize, but you see now, JD2 still download from begin im just upload 2 picture, ALL OF MY DOWNLOAD IS STARTING FROM BEGIN AGAIN THIS IS JD2 YOU SAY IS BETTER MORE EFFECTIVE ??? yes, its better SUCKS and so damn IM NEVER NEVER AND EVER USE ANY JDOWNLOADER WITH DIRECT LINK GOOD BYE JD ,you are SO SUCKS WITH DIRECT LINK Last edited by thecupu; 06.02.2013 at 03:44. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Your network looks mighty unstable, so many socket related errors. Along with DNS lookup issues, probably due to network instability. Are you using over wireless, and if so is the link often saturated, wireless connection strength weak? Is your internet connection saturated, do you have enough bandwidth available for the chunk connections (8).
direct links will behave nearly exactly the same in each version of JDownloader, the only difference with version two is it can detect when chunking isn't possible and use 1 chunk and no resume before failing. The directhttp plugin has been written so that if it fails x times when chunking it will reset with 1 chunk and try downloading again. My advice is, make sure your network is stable, make sure your firewall and antivirus software isn't interfering with JDownloader.exe java.exe javaw.exe, do not use more total connections than your internet / wireless can handle. Please keep in mind max chunks * max dl = total download connections.
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170 Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
i dont talk about chunk ,lets talk about chunk later, the main problem is not about chunk
the main problem is why im always download from begin? im already download 1 GB each link and i must download from begin? ARE YOU KIDDING ?? JD team already TOLD ME to USE JD2 he say more effective and save download information more quickly Quote:
Quote:
NETWORK IS UNSTABLE ?? I DONT CARE ABOUT UNSTABLE OR NOT,CHUNK,FIREWALL,BANDWIDTH AND I DONT USE ANY ANTIVIRUS OR FIREWALL SYSTEM, MY WINDOWS XP FIREWALL ALSO DISABLE IM ASKING ABOUT "WHY IM STARTING DOWNLOADING FROM BEGIN AGAIN"? and you tell me JD2 more effective ? Last edited by thecupu; 06.02.2013 at 12:36. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
YES, thats apple website
and that link is for IOS (ipad/iphone operating system) and also direct link and can resume im not newbie in computer sir here that link, test it our self **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff** Quote:
i think problem with current JDownloader (JD1) is still same with JD2, there is no fixed or something about this problem also i want to correct about statement which say Quote:
but if i force stop download (like instantly reset PC ) , IDM will checking again file that has been downloaded ( this is may take several minute) and resume in at last download, NOT LAST SAVE DATABASE (this is JD CANT DO IT AND THIS IS MAIN PROBLEM) Last edited by thecupu; 06.02.2013 at 17:30. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I have downloaded your Link, and i have no Problems... I have dactivated the Download, and later i activated it > click on play, and it goes... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Your Net is overloaded - so many connection losts and read errors in the logs,
also IP check and update can't connect to the update server. JD tries to resume and can't connect to hoster ("Could not resolv appldnld.apple.com" and then "Link is no longer available" errors) and then: " The directhttp plugin has been written so that if it fails x times when chunking it will reset with 1 chunk and try downloading again." (as already raztoki wrote). I've tried to download one of your files (iPod4,1_6.1_10B144_Restore.ipsw), killed JD2 process when about 26% was downloaded (6 chunks) and after starting again, JD2 continues to download from last savepoint (about 25% - progress is stored in about one minute intervals) - so YES - JD2 is more effective then JD1 - you're wrong with your opinion in post #5. I would rather search what is killing your connections so many times - maybe some torrents in your network? Last edited by editestowy; 07.02.2013 at 00:47. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
my internet is "down" at night, when i wake up, JD2 just download around 50BM but in my HD is downloaded around 1 GB
Quote:
i think i wrong understand between "more effective" and problem is already fix it improve interval time save database is not fix it, it just IMPROVE IT i not promote other download tool, but i believe many download tool is already FIX the problem no matter what problem like network issue,firewall, chunk or what, im never meet the problem before, only with JD i using IDM is around 5 years and im not have any problem with direct httplink maybe i waiting again for JD3 or until JD10, until JD team says "the problem is already FIX it, not about improving anymore" Last edited by thecupu; 07.02.2013 at 05:25. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I explained the reasons behind the issue, if you don't want to listen to advice, why continue?. It's mentioned on the forum multiple times that, that if you have a unstable connection or inadequate bandwidth available for high volume chunking, connections will drop and this is nothing new. Hence my answer: drop the amount of chunks used and you can reduces the risk. If your network just too unstable/unreliable try another download manager. Though you already seem to be doing that.
Thread closed
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170 Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :] Last edited by raztoki; 07.02.2013 at 06:49. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|