#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know this may duplicate earlier reports. If so, it is just an extra log file to help.
Uploading.com usually works fine. These three return a variety of messages from "Not available" (with Disable), to "Temporarily unavailable, wait ...". All show as on-line in LinkGrabber. The Filesize changes depending on the message (0, 206B, 190.70 MB). Code:
**External links are only visible to Support Staff** **External links are only visible to Support Staff** **External links are only visible to Support Staff** :outch:I realized that part09 was missing. I went to Code:
**External links are only visible to Support Staff** The log for this run is divided into the Java Console log and the JD log. They are in the attached RAR. Last edited by drbits; 09.01.2010 at 19:49. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bugtracker ticket for uploading.com
GreeZ pspzockerscene EDIT It is an uploading.com servererror, try to download the links (at least part4 is buggy) in browser and you'll get a 0 KB file!
__________________
JD Supporter, Plugin Dev. & Community Manager
Erste Schritte & Tutorials || JDownloader 2 Setup Download |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
serverproblems! nothing we can do about. i added better handling for those in plugin.
jd shows them as online, because how should be know in advance that these files have serverproblems ![]()
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you for your work.
We have a similar problem with File-Rack. It doesn't recognize missing files until the actual file download begins. I am running some tests now. Please see http://board.jdownloader.org/showthread.php?t=11386. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i already commented on these, there is nothing more we can do for such buggy hoster
![]() only add more and more workarounds
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I understand. I thought you could apply almost the same workaround to file-rack as to uploading. I have just been confirming the problem to see if there is anything else involved (like resuming), and it appears that there is not.
I am mostly just using JD. I do a little testing and reporting. I am not complaining and have no expectations. I have not found any serious flaws in Nightly, and each of the past few Nightly versions appears releasable as Stable. If a plugin is broken in JD, I can usually wait. If I cannot wait, there is always Firefox. ---------------------- I have even been able to get rid of one of the Firefox add-ons (Snap Links Plus) with the internal "link target" processing (which is working flawlessly). Even in the suggestion forum, I wouldn't expect half of them to be implemented and the rest might take a year or two (as part of general upgrades). Last edited by drbits; 02.12.2009 at 03:41. Reason: Get rid of inappropriate smiley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|