[Solved] RAM USAGE and startup time

[wanko]

I have JD2 with ton of links in Downloads tab(138068-476gb) - downloaded - i dont want to delete finished links because i need it to check if i capture dupplicated links in the future , and i have 14582 links-64gb in LinkGrabber tab

How i can reduce RAM USAGE and startup time without delete these links ?....

Like utorrent, 10000+ torrents take a lot of time to startup but after i deleted .torrent files in utorrent folter, it really fast startup and if i add dupplicated torrent, it will notice me.

THANK

[Jiaz]

Please provide a screenshot of your About dialog from JDownloader
What are your system specs? What OS do you use?

[wanko]

Originally Posted by Jiaz

Please provide a screenshot of your About dialog from JDownloader
What are your system specs? What OS do you use?

Windows 7 64bit
http://imgur.com/kLb6a2D

[Jiaz]

How long is your startup time? What firewall/av do you use?
HDD or SDD drive?
RAM usage looks okay

[wanko]

Originally Posted by Jiaz

How long is your startup time? What firewall/av do you use?
HDD or SDD drive?
RAM usage looks okay

HDD, Kaspersky Internet Security, take around 15+/- second. When it running, it take 1,5gb+ ram & when it idle 1gb+ ram, it's normal right ?

[Jiaz]

Long startup time is most likely caused by Kaspersky, as it scans every file opening. This can cause a delay in loading of plugins/its cache and configuration files.

What hosts do you have links in list? Memory usage per link highly depends on what host the link is from.
JDownloader shows a usage of aroud 690Mbyte which is okay for that amount of links.
Please check the about dialog of JDownloader to see the real memory usage! Due the nature of being a vm language, Java allocates more memory than actual in use in order to performe fast!

[wanko]

JAVA (1.19GB/1.45GB/1.65GB) which size is real RAM USAGE ? Or it's min/average/max?

what causes increase ram usage ?
More links = more ram usage ?
It load links to cache to check (mark dupplicated,download directory,download links) so ram usage will increase ?
It's ok for me to keep finished links to avoid dupplicated download ?

THANK

[Jiaz]

Memory usage explained:
current memory usage/current allocated memory(this is what Taskmanager will see)/max allowed memory usage

There is nothing wrong with keeping old links in list, we have a ticket for that
But you should not keep 100k-1M links in history It is better to wait for the history feature then.

[wanko]

Originally Posted by Jiaz

Memory usage explained:
current memory usage/current allocated memory(this is what Taskmanager will see)/max allowed memory usage

There is nothing wrong with keeping old links in list, we have a ticket for that
But you should not keep 100k-1M links in history It is better to wait for the history feature then.

oh, thank u a lot

[Jiaz]

You're welcome