[editestowy]

Probably debug/log info also takes time.
Can you try with switchin off:
Log.debugmodeenabled

[djmakinera]

I do not know if there is time to read but sometimes there is a "stoppage/cork" for slow loading images. Jdownloader do not know read file if I will "not found"or in reality it requires a maybe long time to connect.
At this time (evening) page loads quickly, but in the case of an website traffic can be small or large downtime.

[editestowy]

Originally Posted by pspzockerscene

@editestowy
After the next update, the decrypted links of this plugin are directly visible in the linkgrabber!

Yup - distribute(DownloadLink... links) works exactly as I wanted and described in my post. Learned something new - thanks.

@djmakinera
This site is also extremely slow in browser (Opera):
http ://imgsrc.ru/hihi12345/a822579.html
- it took about 3-3,5 minutes to download 1st page (18 images) of this gallery and some images (5 of them) never downloaded (sometimes it helps to refresh page). So no surprise that the same gallery in JD2 reports connections lost or file not found errors.
With huge galleries I predict a lot of problems.

[djmakinera]

This site is also extremely slow in browser (Opera)

not Always


editestowy - And for me to download 20 pictures about 1 minute

Spoiler:

I got a response from the support page:

We have millions of visits daily and only a few complaining. This is much likely only those few have problems on their side.

[djmakinera]

The problem with the merge package (photo album).
In the screenshot you can see that the pictures have been separated from the package.

[pspzockerscene]

For me it works fine.
I added the first link andgot one package with the packagename "tnndmu@My sexy Facebook friends - Young Girls - Teen and Preteen - Bikinis, Tight Shirts, Tiny Shorts, even some Undies!".
After decrypting 250+ links, i stopped JD.

GreeZ pspzockerscene

[djmakinera]

Parse all links works (but some are separated from the main album).
And the speed of parsing or "check" is already not to mention ...

517 photos (+12 photos split show JD)

Why split?

[themida]

i test it now with other links from same hoster and my result is 48 links into album package and 2 files in one file package.
i think its really a bug

I apologize for intruding on the subject ... but just I have a similar problem ... Turns out I have 2 packages of bonds and desire to unite all links in one package ... but selecting either not allow it, the option of moving to a new package this as disabled ...
themida agree with, because if it is not a bug or a misconfiguration, yesterday if I could join several packages into one and even I could drag and drop links from one package to another, but not anymore ... I try to drag and drop, but the only thing that happens is that you enable file renaming ... it can be?
Data: Windows XP, java 1.7.0_09, JD2, registration jdlog :/ / 1354055966268

dont know what else to add, is not essential, as the JD2 works well, but is a tool I use a lot ..

p.d. pics of bug and version

[themida]

under download you cant move to a new package, because it is disabled, not implemented or anything like this.
it works only under linkgrabber but you can drag and drop files into a other exist package

[raztoki]

@Rextar
merging in download tab isn't possible, they disabled as its action was removing downloads completely in early alpha. I complained heaps ;p You have to click and drag highlighted components to merge within download tab.

I did get files outside packagename also, but I closed JD and was a little annoyed at the content of djmakinera links. I'd say this needs looking at more. Find a link to test with that is age appropriate for us oldies.

Originally Posted by raztoki

@Rextar
merging in download tab isn't possible, they disabled as its action was removing downloads completely in early alpha. I complained heaps ;p You have to click and drag highlighted components to merge within download tab.

I did get files outside packagename also, but I closed JD and was a little annoyed at the content of djmakinera links. I'd say this needs looking at more. Find a link to test with that is age appropriate for us oldies.

thanks for aclaration...

[djmakinera]

raztoki - other link test

**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

[raztoki]

[raztoki]

Fixed, Please wait for the next round of updates for stable / nightly release and JD2 the update should be available shortly!

[djmakinera]

pspzockerscene & raztoki - It does not work Albums password protected

[jd.plugins.decrypter.ImgSrcRu(handlePassword)] -> Decrypter broken for link

**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

password sent PM

[pspzockerscene]

Fixed!
---

[Please read]=>How/when do i get updates?
Read it carefully BEFORE complaining that something would still be not working!
---
[Bitte lesen]=>Wie/wann bekomme ich Updates?
Bitte vollständig lesen bevor ihr euch beschwert, dass etwas immernoch nicht funktionieren würde!

GreeZ pspzockerscene

[djmakinera]

Fixed package.
Not fixed parse protect password album.

[pspzockerscene]

Not yet released

GreeZ pspzockerscene

[djmakinera]

Page is also present in other domain:

add:
.ro
.su

[raztoki]

done!

The links seem to be transferable from one domain to another. So ill just rename them all to ru

[djmakinera]

JD2


[jd.plugins.PluginForDecrypt(decryptLink)] -> CrawlerPlugin out of date

http://jdownloader.org/pastebin/104453

**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

[raztoki]

Think I have fixed it...

they seem to have anti crawler within httpd. So I would advise against mass decrypting!

[djmakinera]

Spoiler:

Originally Posted by raztoki

they seem to have anti crawler within httpd.

Could you write me exactly what that means, and if there are any ways to avoid this?

Well for many years he very massively files download from the side and I do not think that it could be something like this ....

So I would advise against mass decrypting!

There are no such things impossible for me (screen).

Spoiler:

Spoiler:

mo¿na liczyæ gwiazdy , niezliczone jeszcze
i s³uchaæ jak za oknem piêknie graj± ¶wierszcze
i choæ starañ wiele pok³adam w d±¿eniu
by mo¿na masowo pobieraæ z imgsrc.ru mój przyjacielu :D

Edit2:


If you try to parse shows Only a few pictures and stop parsing, error

http://jdownloader.org/pastebin/104531

[raztoki]

Well, the plugin now only processes decrypting one source link at a time.
Plugin is now greatly slowed down due to trying to not trigger imgsrc anticrawling socket timeout stuff. Took a long time to parse all pages and images with you referenced url, but it was the only way I could keep the plugin working.

[djmakinera]

If parser simulates the user experience and thus can not detect that this program works.

If you do not perform rapid analysis of all links / pages, etc. only in moderation then it has to go.

Testing 1 big album works , jd showing all pics

[raztoki]

decrypters typically never simulates the user traditional browser.

Thanks for testing

[djmakinera]

That's not good working properly for a very, very long time. Pasted some links analyze far too long time and slow increase in the number of files ( More than an hour 2000 files jpg {does not seem to be very much})
Unfortunately I had to stop the parsing - it goes really far too long.

I used another program - analyzes pages in minutes. Only throwing more links in the download manager(any not new updates) is already problem, much worse and the support for the full version of this getting worse - even no answer e-mail from support. Already, few people not care about the customers. You buy the program and answers to problems and questions - you do not get and if you get it just deceiving the people that work with them because they do not have time for such help.

[raztoki]

Polish version of English is hard to understand... but as I indicated previously it will be slow. I had to introduce waits to prevent their anti crawling from giving you constant socket errors. Each image within the gallery requires its own page grab, except for the first image on each gallery page. Each page grab has its own random wait time. Only one source link can be processed at a time.

[djmakinera]

If I paste or auto-paste multiple links not may be in order - without analyzing all the links at one time?

Do I need to add only 1 link? When you analyze only the second link, and so on?

[raztoki]

JD will queue source links, if it matches the regular expressions. It will only process one source link at a time, until either finishing or errors. Then it processes next in the queue.

[djmakinera]

JD is using browser firefox? For example, in firefox without ad-block there's no way view pictures to imgsrc.ru - is hidden malicious advertising, which is still in the cards open and sometimes it is so open (Alumu redirect the user to perform a few clicks you). I do not know whether it may also have an impact on decrypter?
Eg in IE9 does not show me these ads

[raztoki]

No JD has its own internal browser. It has absolutely no impact =]

[djmakinera]

I did a test. Using the plugin for firefox browser "Open multiple addresses..." Pasted over 200 links (I set a few-second delay opening) - also at the same time I started to click on the links already opened pages (or even load times) and did not notice the "overload" of the page. It seems to be a stable server and there is no way to block IP and other blockades.

[djmakinera]

I know this is a Jdownloader but I tested in another program and processes/parse more than 20X faster (Not to be confused with time downloading!)


Too slow parses links
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

Average results

Jdownloader
80(+/-) min = 2000 photos

Other program
3...4(+/-) min = 2000 photos

Does not seem that long? Maybe tweak the speed better?

[raztoki]

if I recall correctly, a pile of sleeps were introduced in steps to prevent their anti crawling.

[djmakinera]

raztoki - Maybe another program uses different processing technique?
Interesting here is the processing technique used...
Always the good work. Never block the program and the high-speed processes links...


_____________________________________________________________________________
679 photos = only 1 minute
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

VIDEO TEST ---> **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**
_____________________________________________________________________________

[pspzockerscene]

Anyways, I won't spend any time on that.
If you really want to download that stuff, speed doesn't really matter...

GreeZ psp

[djmakinera]

in 2025 year this program will be more intelligent :D


Solved!

[pspzockerscene]

Maybe
It's not about intelligence here, it's about NOT attacking other servers

GreeZ pspzockerscene