[18Phoenix]

Hallo
Habe aktuell bei YT das Problem einer angeblich großen Anzahl von Anfragen aus meinem Netzwerk.
Nach einer reCAPTCHA Abfrage geht es aber normal weiter.
JD meckert aber nur mit einem "too many requests" Fehler, statt nach einem reCAPTCHA wie gewohnt fortzufahren.
Kommt aktuell immer bei allen Vids, daher kein Beispiel nötig.
Nein, reconnect bringt überhaupt nix.
Hab das jetzt schon 2 Tage, daher wollt ich doch mal fragen.

[pspzockerscene]

@18Phoenix
1. JD kann dieses Captcha (noch) nicht handhaben, da uns bisher niemand davon berichtet hat.

2. An deiner Stelle würde ich eher einen Reconnect machen bzw. auf anderem wege eine neue IP besorgen, um die Sperre ohne Eingabe eines Captchas zu entfernen.

3. Ohne Log können wir hier nicht helfen.

Please post your log-ID here | bitte poste deine Log-ID hier.

-psp-

[elvis_ef]

What is the status of "< 100 Youtube linkz" issue ?

What is the problem with it exactly ?

I know, You wrote it's a pagination problem.
But... a pagination is disappearing or what ?

I suppose this can be a problem due to autoloading content every time I get the end of the page scrolling down. But it wasn't issue some time ago, right ?

Ehh... I need to get more links, it is the most important function here, is anybody working on this ?


EDIT
--------------------
I think the 100 links issue may have a workaround.
I've just tested (by accident) that this YoutubeChannel: **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff** which has more than 100 videos, was read successfully. There was about 179 links.

The problem is, if I use a link to the user on YT, not the channel, it will load all videos. Look at the "/user/" in the URL.

YT says: **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff** - so links with "user" can still be used, but are legacy.

So is there a way to find out what a user login of the channel is ? : >


EDIT 2:
==============
Crazy thing.
I have another "channel", but an old link with a "user" in URL:
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

and with this link, only 100 links are available.

So why with the: **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**]**External links are only visible to Support Staff**]**External links are only visible to Support Staff** more than 100 links can be loaded ?

That's a good question... it does not seem to have differences with pagination.

[pspzockerscene]

@elvis_ef
Sorry but would explaining the technical background help you solving this issue?
I doubt it.

Jiaz is working on it.
Please either be patient or use other tools/workarounds in the meantime ...

-psp-

[elvis_ef]

Originally Posted by pspzockerscene

@elvis_ef
Sorry but would explaining the technical background help you solving this issue?
I doubt it.

-psp-

Certainly, you're right : )
Just asking, because it is still no progress, still 0%.
It's really important I think...

Ok, nevermind, thanks for info. I'll be patient of course.

[pspzockerscene]

Originally Posted by elvis_ef

It's really important I think...

Yes it is but the small team that is working on JDownloader is also working on other things ...
Again: We're open source so the community is more than welcome to contribute code/bugfixes.

-psp-

[elvis_ef]

Originally Posted by pspzockerscene

Yes it is but the small team that is working on JDownloader is also working on other things ...
Again: **External links are only visible to Support Staff**... so the community is more than welcome to contribute code/bugfixes.

-psp-

I think I'll give a try.. from C to PHP, and from PHP to Java, yeah..
Ok, thanks for info.

[Fafner]

Hallo,
ich kann in den Linksammler keine Youtube Playlists einfügen die über 100 Links haben.
Es werden 100 Links eingefügt und dann abgebrochen.
Was kann ich tuen?
Danke für euere Hilfe.
Fafner

[siaris]

Hi.

The problem started after a JDownloader Update, a few weeks ago.

LinkGrabber does not Automatically check Online Status of Youtube file links
in .mp4 - 25fps & 30fps format (there is no problem for .mp4 - 60fps format).
Of course it is still possible to check online status manually.

There is also no problem for Youtube file links in .mkv or .webm formats.

Thanks for your time.

[pspzockerscene]

Merged YT threads.

@siaris
This is not a bug.
It is a plugin optimization to optimize the crawler speed.

-psp-
EDIT

@Fafner
Bekanntes Problem.
Bitte die forensuche verwenden!
Es wird daran gearbeitet ...

[Fafner]

@pspzockerscene Ich habe in der forensuche nichts zu meinem Problem gefunden.

[pspzockerscene]

@Fafner
Link

[CrazySupporter]

Nabend

Ich habe folgendes Problem :
Ich hab meinen PC neu aufgesetzt und dann auch den JD runtergeladen und nun funktioniert kein einziger Link mehr zum Download.
Es kommt bei jedem Link der Offline-Fehler "Error - Too Many Requests".

Woran kann das liegen?

[wdelsx]

I know whoever's developing probably already is aware, but has anyone looked into how youtube-dl does the playlists? as it seems like they can get over 100: **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

[elvis_ef]

Originally Posted by wdelsx

I know whoever's developing probably already is aware, but has anyone looked into how youtube-dl does the playlists? as it seems like they can get over 100: **External links are only visible to Support Staff**...

They said, they're working on it : )

I think JD have this wroten in a different way....

In my second edit here: https://board.jdownloader.org/showpo...postcount=4203 I noticed, that if a "user" word is in the URL (it's an old URL pattern, with a real user login), it seems that JD can get more than 100 videos. But we need t confirm this. I've checked this on two old-pattern URLs.

Have You got the same result ?

[wdelsx]

Originally Posted by elvis_ef

They said, they're working on it : )

I think JD have this wroten in a different way....

In my second edit here: **External links are only visible to Support Staff**... I noticed, that if a "user" word is in the URL (it's an old URL pattern, with a real user login), it seems that JD can get more than 100 videos. But we need t confirm this. I've checked this on two old-pattern URLs.

Have You got the same result ?

Yeah I'm sure it is written differently especially cause youtube-dl is in Python and this is in Java. The "playlists" generated from a user's entire list of videos are different from playlists of conglomerated videos. I wanted to use Jdownloader to download a playlist I've made of YouTube musicians, and that sort of list isn't tied to a user url as far as I know. I'm uncertain of what its pattern would be.

I did just do a link to my channel /videos (which has around 200 videos) and it picked only the first 100

Anyway I'm just switching back to youtube-dl for YouTube videos because I don't think j-downloader's main goal should be to make YouTube work, they seem much more generalist.

[pspzockerscene]

@CrazySupporter
YT Threads zusammengeführt.

Bitte die Forensuche benutzen.
Kurzfassung: Deine IP wurde von Google gesperrt.

Grüße, psp

[Roggefella]

Moin Leuddee,

in einem älteren , als "erledigt" markierten thread von 2017 (https://board.jdownloader.org/showth...nicht+komplett) wurde in einen weiterführenden link eine Lösung des Problems versprochen..., leider scheint es wohl ein Versprecher zu sein :-)

Ich habe eine youtube playlist (**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**) mit 203 Videos und es werden nur 100 im Linksammler gelistet, auch andere playlists werden nach 100 Eintägen kastriert.

Finde ich eventuell in den Profieinstellungen eine Funktion zur maximal zu ladenden Playlist-Einträgen oder hat jemand inzwischen eine Lösung gefunden?

Bis neulich mal wieder

Martin

[pspzockerscene]

YT Threads zusammengeführt.
Bitte die letzten Posts in diesem Thread lesen, insbesondere DIESEN.

Grüße, psp

[jeffr]

Originally Posted by jeffr

...I am a bit confused about the logs though, you did NOT tell me that you didn't need logs, because the post that you were responding to was the first time I had asked you if you needed them. How can I already have been told about the logs if I had only ever asked once?....

I'm still confused about this one. Look back at the threads, you never did tell me that you didn't need logs. Not a big issue obviously, but that comment makes me look dumber than I actually am. You never did actually tell me that you didn't need logs, since you saying "we also told you that we do not need more logs to solve this issue" was the FIRST time ANYONE had responded to my offer to provide logs. That honestly caught me quite off guard the first time I read it (I spent way too much time reading back to see if I actually had been told). I know I make tons of mistakes, but this doesn't actually seem to be one of them, thus I would appreciate it if you could edit your comment. I'm an aspie so I take accuracy seriously, thanks for putting up with me and thanks for your hard work. Looking forward to being able to use JD2 again.