[damo]

Please add support for imhentai.xxx

[pspzockerscene]

Hi,
a plugin for this simple website is not required.
It could be easily done using two LinkCrawler Rules.

Let us know if you need more help with this.

-psp-

[Jiaz]

Please see
https://support.jdownloader.org/Know...kcrawler-rules
https://support.jdownloader.org/Know...le-deepdecrypt

[pspzockerscene]

Additional information/hints:
It won't work 100% because the thumbs are dynamically loaded of there are more than 10 pictures in one gallery ("imhentai.xxx/gallery/123456789/").

Apart from that, you can grab the thunbnail directURLs and modify them e.g.:

m5.imhentai.xxx/100/blabla/1t.jpg

Modify to:

m5.imhentai.xxx/100/blabla/1.jpg

(Remove the "t" at the end.)

... so alternatively, one rule that modifies the thumbnail URLs -> fullsize is enough so you could visit a gallery, click on "view all" once and then add all to JD via CTRK + A and CTRL + C.

-psp-

[damo]

Thanks for the hint.

Have you thought about shipping ready-made rules with jdownloader, instead of having each user to deal with them? Also the interface for the LinkCrawler is not really user friendly.

IMHO a proper plugin would still be better, as it would be more convenient for the users to use, i.e., just copying the gallery url, instead of having to expand every gallery and copying the whole content. Wouldn't the plugin be quite simple if you could base it on the link crawler rules?

[pspzockerscene]

Originally Posted by damo

Have you thought about shipping ready-made rules with jdownloader, instead of having each user to deal with them?

No.

Originally Posted by damo

Also the interface for the LinkCrawler is not really user friendly.

Yes as it is an advanced feature.
I'm pretty sure you will not find any other software with a user friendly interface to create such crawler rules more easily

Originally Posted by damo

IMHO a proper plugin would still be better, as it would be more convenient for the users to use, i.e.,just copying the gallery url, instead of having to expand every gallery and copying the whole content.

Depends on how many users would like to have one.
Keep in mind that plugins are "static" once released to making plugins for simple website may result in a total failure if a website changes while without a plugin, our generic deep-crawler might still be able to find results.
This would mean significantly more work for us while only a hand full of users have a benefit of it.

Also we're open source so you may as well develop your own plugins.

Originally Posted by damo

Wouldn't the plugin be quite simple if you could base it on the link crawler rules?

No it doesn't really make a difference.
As an experienced plugin developer, making a plugin or a rule will take just about the same amount of time.
See my explanation about possible disadvantages of plugins in the upper part of this post.

-psp-