JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #5161  
Old 30.08.2022, 13:49
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mav View Post
issue: "Analyse and Add Links" clears the link from the linkgrabber list (current jd version 46605 from yesterday) without any user confirmation
Thanks for the report. Will be fixed with next update (available in few minutes)
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin

Last edited by Jiaz; 30.08.2022 at 14:01.
Reply With Quote
  #5162  
Old 30.08.2022, 14:10
m.fessler m.fessler is offline
Super Loader
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuknuckle View Post
(...)since the update, all my videos are now added into a package of their own. (...)
Can confirm that, since the update (thanks for that!) the YT files are no longer combined.
Subfolder rule is off and even if the package manager is completely disabled, it does it anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #5163  
Old 30.08.2022, 14:11
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,108
Default

@m.fessler: can you provide example link and a screenshot ?
what exactly do you mean by *no longer combined*? subtitle/thumbnail...
go to their own package or what exactly happens?
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin

Last edited by Jiaz; 30.08.2022 at 14:15.
Reply With Quote
  #5164  
Old 30.08.2022, 14:22
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuknuckle View Post
putting each YouTube video in it's own package by itself and I would like JD to stop doing that. Please explain in more detail how I can make JD work like it used to.
But that is intended/default behaviour. How do you add links? one by one or playlists? so you want all links to go where? into various package?
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #5165  
Old 30.08.2022, 15:08
m.fessler m.fessler is offline
Super Loader
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
@m.fessler: can you provide example link and a screenshot ?
what exactly do you mean by *no longer combined*? subtitle/thumbnail...
go to their own package or what exactly happens?
Attached is a screenshot and three example links - but it should affect all.

**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**
Attached Thumbnails
jd.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #5166  
Old 30.08.2022, 16:58
secon25 secon25 is offline
Junior Loader
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
as they are all re-encodings of original source, I would recommend the format that you prefer. By that I mean do not use ogg if you later convert to m4a.
ok, thank you for the answer
Reply With Quote
  #5167  
Old 30.08.2022, 17:59
fuknuckle fuknuckle is offline
Black Hole
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
But that is intended/default behaviour. How do you add links? one by one or playlists? so you want all links to go where? into various package?
One by one, just right click and copy link to clipboard. **External links are only visible to Support Staff**This is not the default behavior!

Edit:

JD is also doing the same thing for Twitter videos. again, this did not happen before the update.

Last edited by fuknuckle; 30.08.2022 at 19:03. Reason: Added more.
Reply With Quote
  #5168  
Old 30.08.2022, 18:50
Super JD Super JD is offline
Fibre Channel User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DubioserKerl View Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by DubioserKerl

@Jiaz
Don't let impatient people put pressure on you, it's great that you were able to take care of it in a timely manner at all (even if the tests seem to take a bit longer, but that's just how it is sometimes).
This.

JDownloader is free; has been for many years. It's an invaluable workflow assistant and the developers are, apart from generous, unique in how available they are for feedback and concerns. Who else does this? Anybody tried to get a personal answer from one of your app developers lately? A service you subscribe to? I repeat; JDownloader is free and yet it's more dependable than things I pay for. Keep your misplaced sense of entitlement in check if you haven't done so yet.

Thanks, above all else, to the JDownloader team for all the work. This issue with YouTube appears to have been solved, as of now. I can't remember the last time these downloads worked so well; so fast and with the correct file type in place.

Last edited by Super JD; 31.08.2022 at 05:31.
Reply With Quote
  #5169  
Old 30.08.2022, 20:58
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,108
Default

@m.fessler:
@fuknuckle: Thanks for the feedback. I will look into it by tomorrow. sorry for the delay
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #5170  
Old 30.08.2022, 23:05
markifi markifi is offline
Baby Loader
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 8
Default

many thanks for fixing this issue with today's update. works excellent now
Reply With Quote
  #5171  
Old 31.08.2022, 04:32
ZoloFanboy124 ZoloFanboy124 is offline
Modem User
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 1
Default

I'm also having the issue of each youtube link going into their own subfolder instead of one various folders one since the update.
Reply With Quote
  #5172  
Old 31.08.2022, 10:28
DubioserKerl DubioserKerl is offline
Baby Loader
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Default

How is that "Not all YT links go into a random default package" an issue for people? I think it is better that way, and it fits the "Customized Packagename" option in the YT plugin.
Reply With Quote
  #5173  
Old 31.08.2022, 16:36
m.fessler m.fessler is offline
Super Loader
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
@m.fessler:
@fuknuckle: Thanks for the feedback. I will look into it by tomorrow. sorry for the delay
No stress - thanks for the TOP service!

Is this the right place to ask for help with plugin configuration?
Unfortunately, my TV does not support videos that have a higher vertical resolution than 1080px.
This works well with the setting "1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p" under image/video resolution, but not with shorts - they are loaded with 1280px.

Example:
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

JD downloads it in the resolution 720x1280.
Is there a way to specify the maximum height of a video?
Like e.g. yt-dlp with [height<=1080] - here the video is downloaded with 480x854.

But I'd like that in JD... is this somehow possible?

Thanks and greetings,
Martin
Reply With Quote
  #5174  
Old 01.09.2022, 23:33
JDmurphy JDmurphy is offline
Fibre Channel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 120
Question Weird things happening again ...

TL;DR below!

On August 18th, like most people showing up here, I was hit by the throttle and - at the time of #4979 being the latest post - went on writing a big ass long reply reporting/confirming the issue, answering some questions and asking some myself ... only to then realize shortly before sending it that in the meantime @Leifman had written almost the exact same things word for word so I scrapped the whole thing to not be mistaken as an alt account of theirs and read along silently ever since.

On August 29th (!) late afternoon, I noticed youtube dl speeds were back to normal again out of nowhere (almost, peculiarly I had one single yt video downloading at max speed a couple of days before) and that without me updating JDownloader. So I assumed google had simply lifted the throttle, just like they did last time at some point. Quickly double-checking the JD About, I was still on build #46316 of June 26th. So I checked the plugin timestamps, since I read somewhere that - other than the core - it's possible to force plugin updates silently in the background, but the newest YoutubeDashV2*.class files were still dated June 10th. To me all of that looked like the throttle had coincidentally been lifted around the same time the update was released which, again, I had not manually installed via restart and as far as I could tell also weren't installed automatically without restart either. And this time I did make screenshots for proof ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
Then this remains to be weird, since as said I'm sure all my video files were downloaded in chunks until at least mid/late May (while having a keen eye on it but sadly no proof) despite daily JD updates
... so that this doesn't happen again

Anyways, here's my question:

TL;DR

Is it possible that the relevant changes to restore full yt dl speed were applied
a) while JD2 was running - which means 24/7 with no restarts
b) without updating the core - which had been mentioned repeatedly to be necessary
c) without updating the youtube plugin - which I assume are the YoutubeDashV2*.class files
...?

I'm curious to know for technical reasons and also for future reference to be able to tell what's going on.

P.S.: Anyone else observing yt dl speeds going back to normal while JD2 was running continuously without any updates happening?
Reply With Quote
  #5175  
Old 02.09.2022, 11:23
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
since I read somewhere that - other than the core - it's possible to force plugin updates silently in the background,
Wrong wording on "force plugin updates". They are not forced but normal plugin updates can be downloaded/installed/applied in background/without restart if there is no pending core update waiting for installation. See https://support.jdownloader.org/Know...pdate-behavior

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
Is it possible that the relevant changes to restore full yt dl speed were applied
a) while JD2 was running - which means 24/7 with no restarts
Answer: No, because the required change to make the broken function work again is part of the core and therefore restart is required
b) without updating the core - which had been mentioned repeatedly to be necessary
Answer: No, because the required change to make the broken function work again is part of the core and therefore restart is required
c) without updating the youtube plugin - which I assume are the YoutubeDashV2*.class files
Answer: Yes, because the fixed function is not part of the plugin but part of the core
See my answers in text

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
On August 29th (!) late afternoon
Updates has been released on August 29 15:30 o'clock german time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
I'm curious to know for technical reasons and also for future reference to be able to tell what's going on.
There are several version of *player js* and when speed was low a new version got deployed that incorporates
current date and also required error handling support. this broke our plugin and therefore speed was low. but it is one player
out of many, so either the js (depending on the date) behaved differently and did not break or a new player
has been deployed or the the video was using a different/working player.
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin

Last edited by Jiaz; 02.09.2022 at 11:29.
Reply With Quote
  #5176  
Old 02.09.2022, 11:24
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,108
Default

@m.fessler: Settings->Plugins->youtube.com, there you can customize plugin to your own needs, eg disable unwanted resolutions.
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #5177  
Old 02.09.2022, 12:37
m.fessler m.fessler is offline
Super Loader
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
@m.fessler: Settings->Plugins->youtube.com, there you can customize plugin to your own needs, eg disable unwanted resolutions.
Yes, I selected there 1080p as the highest resolution (under "Allowed media types").
But when I add the link, vertical videos were added as 1280p into the link collector.
Am I doing something wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #5178  
Old 02.09.2022, 12:46
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,108
Default

@m.fessler: thanks, will check it
Update:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
@m.fessler: Settings->Plugins->youtube.com, there you can customize plugin to your own needs, eg disable unwanted resolutions.
this way doesn't play nicely as you don't specify the max but only tell JDownloader in what groups you are interested in. Please use Settings->Advanced Settings->Youtube.maxvideoresolution after next core update to limit your max resolution
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin

Last edited by Jiaz; 02.09.2022 at 15:35.
Reply With Quote
  #5179  
Old 03.09.2022, 10:34
markifi markifi is offline
Baby Loader
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 8
Default

https://i.imgur.com/5uOP1Mo.png
the speed issue seems to be back unfortunately
Reply With Quote
  #5180  
Old 03.09.2022, 10:36
DubioserKerl DubioserKerl is offline
Baby Loader
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markifi View Post
**External links are only visible to Support Staff**...
the speed issue seems to be back unfortunately
yep, same for me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:52.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.