Well, i actually haven't found a list with topic.

[djmakinera]

Originally Posted by ambush

Well, i actually haven't found a list with topic.

What's new in JD2?

Hell jungle, endless boiling water. Two colors of yellow and green. Swollen from mosquito weather. At the tunnel a loud, smoky, you can now download more porn video:lol: (joke)

[Jiaz]

@djmakinera: you forgot the mega cool soundtrack

[djmakinera]

by Mr. Jiaz heavy hammer time fortunately did not destroy the program

ambush - IT is my life, well you know it. I do what I love what you do not know. Do you like the program because there are new plugins have used. ^^

Seriously, guys. Is it worth to udpate - or will it just spoil my pc, as one poorly written VB6 program once did?

[Jiaz]

....why not see yourself?!

-Java 1.7 compatible
-new translation framework
-noticable less ram/cpu
-new update system
-plugin updates work without jd restart
-better/more helpfull logging system
-starts in less than 1 sec on my computer
-able to handle much more links than old version
-linkfilter
-packagizer
-extraction addon that supports rar,zip,7zip,hj,xtm.....
-rewritten ui
-nearly complete rewritten core
-very fast linkcrawler (multithread)
-very fast linkchecker (multithread)
-multi IP/Proxy support
-multihost support (real support and not experimental like in nightly)
-new storage backend, uses less ram, much safer than old one
......

Originally Posted by Jiaz

....why not see yourself?!

WHERE? I don't see any list.

[Jiaz]

by testing it?!

I would prefer a list. Time is not enough for downloading everything and testing it.

At least you could publish the things you have written above.

[Jiaz]

Originally Posted by Jiaz

....why not see yourself?!

-Java 1.7 compatible
-new translation framework
-noticable less ram/cpu
-new update system
-plugin updates work without jd restart
-better/more helpfull logging system
-starts in less than 1 sec on my computer
-able to handle much more links than old version
-linkfilter
-packagizer
-extraction addon that supports rar,zip,7zip,hj,xtm.....
-rewritten ui
-nearly complete rewritten core
-very fast linkcrawler (multithread)
-very fast linkchecker (multithread)
-multi IP/Proxy support
-multihost support (real support and not experimental like in nightly)
-new storage backend, uses less ram, much safer than old one
......

a short list

[djmakinera]

The program is well-written, just need to know how to use it.

There are opinions that the program heavy because it is written in Java.

Well, if you published it before, some more people would try it.

Java 1.7 compatible

Very interesting for end users Aren't JDK 6 and 7 bytecode compatible?

noticable less ram/cpu

Less RAM? Interesting.

[Jiaz]

who care's about bytecode? it must be api compatible and many api got changed/added in 1.7.
we try our best to keep it 1.6 runtime compatible. to compile it you already need 1.7

who care's about bytecode?

End user? He doesn't give a like about source code

we try our best to keep it 1.6 runtime compatible.

So aren't they bytecode compatible?

[Jiaz]

bytecode != api

bytecode = java 1.6 runtime can start it
api = java 1.6 provides all needed api

jd is compiled on 1.6 bytecode
jd uses java 1.7 functions where needed, but keeps 1.6 compatibility

What are these 1.7 funktions that are not present in 1.6?

[Jiaz]

checkout the complete source. use java 1.6 and see the error log yourself

Any function names / links to discussions?

[Jiaz]

?? we use java 1.7 in source..if you want to see what exactly...fetch the source..see yourself

just an example
Character.isAlphabetic is java 1.7

How much would it take you to make it more or less stable?

[raztoki]

I assume you mean how long until it is considered worthy as a stable release.

I'd say a couple months, if not longer. It really depends on how quickly the finishing touches and issues are applied/resolved.

But its stable to use, as it's been built on existing jdownloaders with multiple years of rewrites from the previous stable release (0.9.581 last09), and over a year for nightly. It's lacking GUI refinement (more than anything), but it's usable if your looking for an alternative, just without all the fruit.

in this beta work ufile.eu?
and another thing, when this JD will release to stable version?

[raztoki]

read my post above that was answered.

But its stable to use,

Not really. It has serious bugs preventing normal work. I.e. reconnect doesn't work, files are not downloaded for unknown reason.

[raztoki]

reconnect does work, and files do download. If you have any substantiated error reports please make error reports accordingly. Please do not make careless statements which you haven't backed up with any proof. Developers use this version to develop plugins so it needs to work. Plugins should behave universally so if they work in stable they should work in nightly and JD2. There are many plugins which have JD2 dependences like RTMP plugins or the newer multihoster plugins.

[Jiaz]

Originally Posted by ambush

Not really. It has serious bugs preventing normal work. I.e. reconnect doesn't work, files are not downloaded for unknown reason.

both works fine..if you are unable to provide proper bugreports and only want to troll..have fun.

[pspzockerscene]

Closed!

GreeZ pspzockerscene