JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26.12.2019, 23:13
Beer Beer is offline
JD Beta
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 56
Exclamation JD 2 - oneload.xyz URL:Blacklist - Web Shield Connection Aborted

I have received this notification for the second time. The first was when i created the scat.gold thread. I'm using AVG Premium. I wasn't even doing anything. The program was just open. https://imgur.com/a/y1MmNRH What is oneload.xyz and why is it blacklisted? Is it http? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27.12.2019, 03:52
raztoki's Avatar
raztoki raztoki is offline
English Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 16,711
Default

not sure why without seeing a log, but if you copy a url on the clipboard thats supported by a generic plugin (directhttp class) it will then try to linkcheck that url, and also the core will try to fetch associated favicon for that url domain.

I did check the source and we do not support the domain, so I can only assume you copied a url in which triggered JD todo something.

raztoki
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer
http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170

Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27.12.2019, 18:03
Beer Beer is offline
JD Beta
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 56
Default

Here is the log, sorry. 26.12.19 21.46.26 26.12.19 23.49.35 jdlog://0623330900751/ I created the thread as soon as i got the alert so look for it on the very end. Okay, trying to retrace my steps here. The first time i had copied one URL from scat.gold, for that sample, but the alert only kicked in several minutes after that. The second time, i had copied a URL from Thisvid. Again, the alert only came a few minutes after. I also copied a couple of URL's from fboom and takefile. Was just trying some links from the leo312 site. I had never tried using JD for cyberlockers. I noticed how fboom blocked the IP after the first attempt, which i had aborted. I won't be using your reconnect feature. Didn't knew what that was for before this. For the record, i only use JD for PH/PH Premium. Over 80000 links there, and over 30000 downloaded. Some 15000 used and deleted since i started exactly 3 months ago, i don't really know. I downloaded, used and deleted around a thousand from XVideos (don't use anymore). Half a dozen from Xhamster, literally... and two from Thisvid, and oh the one from scat.gold. I once read a thread on reddit about JD, titled "File hosting service WSTREAM gets mad at jDownloader and menaces to redirect users to shock site". This one **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff** Is it possible that these smelly websites (lol) are doing something to JD users? Edit: Oh yeah, almost forgot, also copied some 250 links from Eporner. Try searching for "Colombian". Some super quality chaturbate streams!! Still have some 200 kept on a DLC. I mean, i also tried copying once from ManyVids and Bestgore i think, but never downloaded anything. Isn't the Link Grabber stealth when adding links without checking online status? I set my PH/PH Premium plugin for fast checkin and then check them all for online status in order to obtain the file size once i´m done with it. This way i get the links faster, and the file size in the end. A good trick that makes manual collection through the clipboard observer more reliable (less fails and waiting time) is to open the videos in separates tabs. Like 50 at once (if you have enough memory) and then copy each URL while deleting the tab. Much more efficient. Always check for the pop up on each link, otherwise it probably failed. Check a different URL if it keeps on failing and come back again. Sorry! lol xD

Last edited by Beer; 27.12.2019 at 18:21.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28.12.2019, 00:08
raztoki's Avatar
raztoki raztoki is offline
English Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 16,711
Default

JD will scan html that ends up on the clipboard, eg. you highlight and copy text on websites, it commonly also copies the section of html behind it also, in which JD will also check (ontop of text only component). I assume thats how it happened originally, if you did not copy URL. We will have to wait for one of the other supporters to check the log, as I don't have access atm.
Either way security scanners do present these type of messages (historically reports have come in the past) though its not an issue, as JD does not function like a normal webbrowser.

raztoki
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer
http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170

Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:00.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.