JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

View Poll Results: JDownloader 0.7 Good or Evil
Good 173 82.78%
Evil 36 17.22%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 25.08.2009, 03:01
hightop07
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default upgraded now my downloads are slow

I just upgraded this weekend and now my netload premium account down loads are very slow. Not sure why this is but previous JDownloader allowed almost ten times faster down load speeds. Did any one else have same problem or maybe a solution. thanks
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 25.08.2009, 03:44
maeron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I like 0.7 much much better than the old ones... It is much faster, great GUI and supports more hosts... VERY GOOD!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 25.08.2009, 07:03
Wheezer Wheezer is offline
Bandwidth Beast
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WheezerLand
Posts: 130
Default Overall good stuff ....

Long wait for the new version, generally way much more excellent better.
Good:
1) Many fixed hosters
2) Different (better) interface
3) Lilnkgrabber package names now work correctly off of the file names
4) Easier way to deal with accounts (very much better)
5) A whole lot of things now work as they should.
6) Stable ... ran 48hours no crash, downloading continuously.

Bad:
1) Seizes up a bit, but after a while comes back.
2) Slooow screen repaint at times, I have tried multiple sytles but still a bit sluggish.
(QUESTION: Can we have just a PLAIN skin, even the 2D one is slow at times)

Overall:
Excellent!
Especially the point where you can now slipstream in hoster updates, instead of waiting for an an entire new release.
Hopefully, now that it is out with functions, you can tune it a bit for performance.

Test System [download box]
Dual Xeon, 8GB, 3xU320 disks, 2GB Nic, XP Pro/SP3

Thanks!
... W ...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 25.08.2009, 07:30
lightwave3d lightwave3d is offline
JD Addict
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: jdownloader.org
Posts: 173
Default

Code:
(QUESTION: Can we have just a PLAIN skin, even the 2D one is slow at times)
you can select the "windows style"
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 25.08.2009, 09:19
Wheezer Wheezer is offline
Bandwidth Beast
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WheezerLand
Posts: 130
Default

Thanks ... I did not see that on the top if the list.
Not as nice as the others, but faster and no screen paint delays.
While I would like it "beautiful", it is more important to be fast and stable.
THanks again.
... W ...
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 25.08.2009, 11:35
kidphys
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Everything seems good except the link grabber. In JD 0.6 I can just paste in a mediafire folder and the link grabber can fetch all the file links inside. Now I can not do that, JD simply says 'file offline'. Is it a bug?
Edit: yes, wait for update

Last edited by Jiaz; 25.08.2009 at 11:40.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 25.08.2009, 15:57
JamieWolf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Feels much faster than the versions before.

Only thing on Mac OS X, sometimes the whole windows blanks to gray. If you move over buttons they apear. Switching to another tab ie. downloads shows everything normal again, switching back to the blanking tab ie. Linkgrabber makes 0.7 go blank again.

But still nice job guys!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 25.08.2009, 22:03
GhostMjr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guys can you please stick with an interface.

I have had to adapt to 3 since i got jdownloader!!

I don't like having to go all the way done to the bottom right to click continue to add the url's i have pasted in the url capture.

Tbh the previous version i preferred and it was easier to use :(

I am thinking of moving elsewhere after so many changes do u guys even know that changing this much shows u guys don't know what you want or what u market wants!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 25.08.2009, 23:23
Wheezer Wheezer is offline
Bandwidth Beast
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WheezerLand
Posts: 130
Default

.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 26.08.2009, 01:10
Dejan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bingo!

You guys really hit the jackpot with this one.
It's fast (faster than any previous version that I used), it's good looking, it's reliable...I'm not having ANY trouble with it.:thumbup:
So guys, PLEASE dont experiment any more, update hosters, work on addons and let us enjoy.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 26.08.2009, 07:17
rafi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

with 3 downloads/3 connections - there is a huge memory consumption :
http://img40.imageshack.us/i/73659158.png/
note: 1 error popup was opened for a long time...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 26.08.2009, 09:29
Gweilo's Avatar
Gweilo Gweilo is offline
JD Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 716
Default

A few labels are confusing.

"Continue": This gives no indication of of WHERE you're "continuing" to.
I had to click it, hoping nothing bad would happen, to find out that this actually transfers links from the Linkgrabber to the Download queue.

How about "Enqueue"? Or "Add to Downloads"? But just "Continue" is no information at all.

Alao, the word "hoster" is used frequently.
THIS IS NOT AN ENGLISH WORD. There is no need to coin such a word, the noun for a person, or website, providing hosting services is just "HOST" (for completeness: unless she's female, in which case it's "hostess"). I know this word has been used in JD for quite a while, but it's still poor usage and should be corrected.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 26.08.2009, 11:53
editestowy's Avatar
editestowy editestowy is offline
Polish Supporter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PL
Posts: 3,029
Default

Definitely 0.7.* version was worth waiting for.
For me the biggest problem was refreshing the browser and new interface is much more user friendly.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 26.08.2009, 12:34
hahlin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

First of all, I'd like to thank to all developement team for JD. It is wonderful and let me enjoy my daily life with automatically downloading.

I used JD from 0.4.936. It is stable with slow GUI sometimes. anyway , it is awesome. Most of time, I use it to download files through Megaupload with high speed.

But after I upgraded to 0.7X, some files from megaupload meet the same terrible problem, that is, the file size was changed between checking and during downloading. The downloaded file size will be wired. sometimes, the size will go up to more than 10 times (ex. 40Mb to 700Mb). I tried to download it by firefox 3.5, it is correct.

I wonder whether the web master of megaupload change some inside or some bugs from JD. But the downloading from Badongo or rapidshare are all corret.

except the above, 0.7x is very good. It directly support recognition of Badongo, even sometimes, it failed.

anyone meet the same situation like me?

thanks

Last edited by hahlin; 26.08.2009 at 12:46.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 26.08.2009, 15:35
Zeokat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

0.7 is good, working very good at the moment.

The unique bad things that i found at the moment is that the gui load little slow and when i start the program it not appears as the selected program, it is sent to background... o_0^

So definetly good, but can be better

Anyways thanks to all developers and contributers for this very good tool
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 26.08.2009, 20:04
rock-star
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Awesome
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 26.08.2009, 23:38
lexus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default MMMM pienso q sigue siendo Lento como la vercion anterior

Quote:
Originally Posted by rock-star View Post
Awesome
Hey chicos a pesar de haber simplificado la interfaz de usuario en esta vercion 0.7 esta muy bien pero creo q con respecto a la interfaz anterior casi esta igual de lenta no note un cambio muy insignificante aparte de eso tiene muchos fallos.

List of Bug. ESPANISH

1. Parpadea mucho la interfaz al seleccionar un paquete teniendo a mas de 20 paquetes en lista de descarga.

2. La velocidad de descarga no funciona al Full como en la vercion anterior

3. El sistema de actualizacion conlleva alguno pequeños errores como al descargar soloamente una actualzacion por fecha al mismo tiempo haciendo la actualizacion muy repetitiva.

por otro lado creo q van por un muy buen camino no me queda mas q felicitarlos y otro punto devil en el q se han quedado muy corto a mi punto de vista es en la seguriodad del programa.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 27.08.2009, 09:06
Valensia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default JDownloader 0.7

It is definitely very good, it works fine for me with many hosters as a free user without consuming significant amount of cpu.
Many thanks to jd team, keep up the good work guys and please don't forget to update plugins regularly.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 27.08.2009, 17:25
redhatGizmo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Evil Word is not suitable in any condiotion for such pecious piece
of work (which also comes free) thread has to be like "good" or "not soo good" btw 07 is gr8 improvment in terms of performance ,stability features , bugs , plugins , memory (only cost 20~ mb ram(In windows style) ..etc only thing i not much like is the new tab bar interface previous side bar one was more unique and pleasing to eye ..but a straight flush 10/10...:thumbup:
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 27.08.2009, 18:40
go4saket
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for the new verion but this version seems to be full of bugs. I hopw they will be treated soon.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:21.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.