JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 22.10.2010, 11:14
buggsy buggsy is offline
BugMeNot Account
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: everywhere/nowhere
Posts: 1,126
Default

thank you for considering.
fyi, after removing the captchas i found in that folder, indeed all new captchas are automatically deleted when JD closes. so the captchas I found resulted from crashs as expected.
and, after running a filecomparison over those ~4k captchas: two times two captchas were the same. not exactly much, for a hash-database..

manuel
  #202  
Old 22.10.2010, 14:01
fff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tja - ok ... man ist immer wieder überrascht wenn einen eine Idee kommt und jemand anderes hatte die schon ..8)

Wollte nur Gutes tu ...8)

Wünsch euch ein schönes Wochenende ...
  #203  
Old 22.10.2010, 15:25
pspzockerscene's Avatar
pspzockerscene pspzockerscene is offline
Community Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deutschland
Posts: 66,691
Default

Jo ich weiß doch, dass es gut gemeint ist.
Ich hoffe mein Post liest sich nicht so streng, wollte dich ja nicht von hier verscheuchen

GreeZ pspzockerscene
__________________
JD Supporter, Plugin Dev. & Community Manager
JDownloader 2 Setup Download
Spoiler:

A users' JD crashes and the first thing to ask is:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
Do you have Nero installed?
That's true James
Quote:
Originally Posted by James
Die Leute verstehen einfach nicht dass nur weil man mit einer Waffe auch auf Menschen schießen kann dass ein Schützenver​ein kein Ort für Amoklaufide​en ist
  #204  
Old 24.10.2010, 16:32
buggsy buggsy is offline
BugMeNot Account
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: everywhere/nowhere
Posts: 1,126
Lightbulb Solidarity Captcha

The re-captcha problem cant be solved...
But it is a pain in the ass to stay by the PC waiting to write the next captcha.
Can be made some plugin to write them all together.
Maybe some type of points sistem where one user write the captchas for another user, and earn pont. Then when the first user needs a capcha and is not near to the PC jdown spend a point and send the captcha to anothe user to be written.
That way we can write 10,12 or 50 captchas at the same time and go away. we will have 50 point to spend, and another user will write our captcha.

Sorry for the bad english
  #205  
Old 25.10.2010, 04:44
drbits's Avatar
drbits drbits is offline
JD English Support (inactive)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Physically in Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 4,437
Default

At least two commercial systems (1-2 cents per answer) and one distributed captcha answer system already exist. Please read earlier in the thread.
  #206  
Old 25.10.2010, 11:43
remi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

@buggsy

Please read the previous pages and you'll see that this proposal has already been made. I would call it "Mutual captcha solving".
  #207  
Old 26.10.2010, 05:22
gonzas144
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by travolter View Post
If all major host are using reCaptcha.. this is the end for them...
Spoiler:
They think:
"Because reCaptcha cannot be hacked, everyone will buy premium"

WRONG!!!

People will stop using JD and other managers and use P2P or other free hosts.
Really having JD popups every minute with reCaptcha is insane..

Soon everyone will stop using JD and if uploaders receive or received money uploading to these host they will stop, because people will not follow your game.

Filefactory, Hotfile.. and many others.. I hope you die soon!!! we will be back to P2P!


Moderator Edit: Please post editorials and other opinions in the General Discussion forum. I have also taken the liberty to correct some of your spelling. The original was hard to understand (drbits)
It's a shame that reCaptcha can't be hacked. :S

But, we can boicot the servers that use this system, like HotFile , Fileserve, ... probablly hosts that do not use recaptcha will progress instead of who use reCaptcha.

Greetz.
  #208  
Old 26.10.2010, 09:39
remi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

reCaptcha has been hacked. Please read this thread.

The issue is that nobody, except the spammers, have the courage to implement Chad Houck's algorithms.

The pressure of Gogol's power elite should be the reason, because I don't know any other.

The professional spammers keep these implementations for themselves because it means a competitive advantage for them.
  #209  
Old 26.10.2010, 09:46
willemijns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by remi View Post
The pressure of Gogol's power elite should be the reason, because I don't know any other.
because the core recaptcha whole idea can be changed at every time ! if
MU keep his kind of easy captcha and not recaptcha or another concept, they are some reasons no ?

Me and others ppl have already explained this to you in public but at every time you refuse to understand this it is near of annoying !!!
  #210  
Old 26.10.2010, 10:16
remi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe Houck and the adaptivity of his algorithms. Houck is an independent researcher. Why should he lie? He published his algorithms as a proof. There's nothing more beautiful than science. If it wouldnt' be true what he's telling us, then someone would have refuted his theory and his algorithms.

Did you see one scientific paper rejecting Houck's approach? I'll believe you if you would implement those algorithms and show us in a scientific way that Houck's algorithms aren't working. He said that one day is sufficient for implementing them.
  #211  
Old 26.10.2010, 11:20
bici-boci bici-boci is offline
JD Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by willemijns View Post
Me and others ppl have already explained this to you in public but at every time you refuse to understand this it is near of annoying !!!
Why do you think that you are the holder of the truth ?
Please don't explain your personal opinion in this style and so loud.
  #212  
Old 26.10.2010, 11:56
willemijns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Because remi know this opinion (whatever they are true or false) but he/she always forget it.
  #213  
Old 26.10.2010, 16:17
bici-boci bici-boci is offline
JD Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by willemijns View Post
Because remi know this opinion (whatever they are true or false) but he/she always forget it.
And you know his/her opinion .
  #214  
Old 26.10.2010, 16:50
willemijns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yes coz i hasread old messages on this thread ^^
  #215  
Old 26.10.2010, 17:23
bici-boci bici-boci is offline
JD Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by willemijns View Post
yes coz i hasread old messages on this thread ^^
Then I finally don't understand your tone.
  #216  
Old 27.10.2010, 01:55
daVinci
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't believe this discussion goes on and on - JD Staff made clear, they don't want to have reCAPTCHA cracked, bypassed, orc'd whatsoever...

by the way, i found this on twitter: antirecaptcha v0.2c for jD
seems to be working

Last edited by daVinci; 27.10.2010 at 01:59. Reason: external links not allowed
  #217  
Old 27.10.2010, 08:08
willemijns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

17% of good answer... sufficient yes...
  #218  
Old 27.10.2010, 09:06
drbits's Avatar
drbits drbits is offline
JD English Support (inactive)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Physically in Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 4,437
Default

The developers here expect anicaptcha algorithms to perform at 95% accuracy. There is a minimum of 80%. In addition, the algorithm must not need "re-training" between major JD releases.
________________________________

Please stop bickering about this. This is something that has the developer's attention. They won't read this discussion any more, but will wait until one of the supporters says there is something useful here.

After 212 messages, you could say that this has reached a boiling point (Fahrenheit).
  #219  
Old 27.10.2010, 10:11
remi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

I've no problem with willemijn's comments. (S)he defends the use of reCaptchas and from the point of view of the file hosts this is understandable. Some hosts want to block freeloaders (and in particular people with bad eyes) as much as possible and other hosts have implemented other means for service differentiation.

@drbits

Does this include reCaptcha as well? Houck's algorithms have a success rate of 30 %. That would mean that jD's specialists will have to do better than Houck.
  #220  
Old 27.10.2010, 10:34
willemijns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

He i'm a real man.

> The developers here expect anicaptcha algorithms to perform at 95% accuracy.

you can expect for a long time ^^
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:10.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.