[Jiaz]

Originally Posted by JDmurphy

After app restart:
Field: package name for videos that are part of a crawled channel
Value: <empty>



will be fixed with next update, unrelated to other reported issue

[Jiaz]

Originally Posted by hawk

The channel's name is "Quantum Tech HD" and the username is "QuantumTech".

No, it's not.

author=Quantum Tech HD

QuantumTech

is the new introduced @ direct personalized username and can be different than author(at least this is information I found).
Internally it's called @id, see

{"@id": "http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@QuantumTech", "name": "Quantum Tech HD"}

If you want access to this field, then we should introduce new pattern to access it because changing existing username field
could easily break stuff for other users.
I will add new pattern

@ID

with next update

[hawk]

Originally Posted by Jiaz

No, it's not.
is the new introduced @ direct personalized username and can be different than author(at least this is information I found).
Internally it's called @id, see

If you want access to this field, then we should introduce new pattern to access it because changing existing username field
could easily break stuff for other users.
I will add new pattern with next update

That would be great. Thank you.

[zOrlAc]

Quick question regarding YouTube, just so I can understand how JD downloads audio vs. video. I use the default settings in JD (best audio quality, best video quality, etc.), so I understand that JD always picks the best format based on the actually uploaded material. When I select a file like this, JD usually gives me the option of 1 Audio file (usually m4a, ogg, or opus, 1 video file (usually mpeg or webm) plus the jpg thumbnail and txt description. Then I convert the resulting audio or video file to MP3.

My y question is: Suppose I pick a relatively new file encoded with Opus/Webm, is the audio the same quality in both options? In other words, is the actual audio quality the same in the audio and video file (after downloading them with JD)? Is there a difference, whether I convert o MP3 from the audio versus the video file?

[pspzockerscene]

Merged YT threads.

[zOrlAc]

pspzockerszene, I see you merged my post with this thread. However, I was NOT reporting an error. I had a general question regarding how JD downloads videos. In short. Is the audio quality the same for the downloaded video file as for the SAME audio file for each youtube link or does JD use different methods to download the video vs audio files?

[pspzockerscene]

Originally Posted by zOrlAc

However, I was NOT reporting an error.

I know.
Please re-read the title of this thread.

Originally Posted by zOrlAc

I had a general question regarding how JD downloads videos.

I did read your question but I'm unable to answer it as I'm not involved in YT host plugin development.
Please wait for another team member to answer your question.

[zOrlAc]

Ok, Thank you for clarifying!

[Jiaz]

Originally Posted by zOrlAc

usually gives me the option of 1 Audio file (usually m4a, ogg, or opus, 1 video file (usually mpeg or webm) plus the jpg thumbnail and txt description. Then I convert the resulting audio or video file to MP3.

Those are the variants, that are grouped and selected in Settings->Plugins->youtube.com, you can also define own ones. best is "best" within selected settings. if you disable higher bitrates, then best will be best out of the rest and so on.

Originally Posted by zOrlAc

onvert the resulting audio or video file to MP3.

Why convert at all and loose yet again quality? nearly any device out there should be able to playback mp4 files?

Originally Posted by zOrlAc

My y question is: Suppose I pick a relatively new file encoded with Opus/Webm, is the audio the same quality in both options? In other words, is the actual audio quality the same in the audio and video file (after downloading them with JD)? Is there a difference, whether I convert o MP3 from the audio versus the video file?

MP3 is heavily outdated audio compression and performances bad in comparision with opus/aac and other modern codecs.opus is a codec, webm is a container. yt offers audio in aac and opus, but which one you use...decision is up to you. in 99,9999% you will not notice/hear a difference.

[zOrlAc]

To give you a quick example: **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**
In JD's Linkgrabber, it shows up as:
AUDIO: Filename (152kbit_Opus).opus
and
VIDEO: Filename (2160p_24fps_VP9 LQ-160kbit_Opus).webm
I assume these are the highest quality respectively. My question is: Is the audio quality the same in both files?

[zOrlAc]

lol ... we posted at exactly the same time.

[zOrlAc]

Thank you for the answer. Opus and Webm doesn't play in my car, but MP3 and FLAC works. So, I'm just looking for which file would be the higher respective quality, so I can convert it to MP3 or FLAC (I know it wouldn't be true lossless FLAC, but at least I wouldn't loose more quality from the conversion).

[Jiaz]

@zOrlAc: okay, old car player, agree In that case, it really doesn't matter if you're using aac or opus as source, as the dest will be mp3 anyway Any *better* quality of the aac/opus most likely will be gone after compressing again into mp3

[zOrlAc]

OK, thank you!

My question was really more about the difference in audio quality between the audio vs. video file downloaded through JD. But I think you sort of answered that too. If I understand correctly, the audio in the video file is essentially the same as the audio file, correct?

[Jiaz]

@zOrlAc: yt offers audio video in separate streams and just get muxed (merged into one file) at the end. so short answer: yes, it's the same file

[zOrlAc]

Thank you very much for clarifying!

[Jiaz]

Originally Posted by zOrlAc

Thank you very much for clarifying!

You're welcome!

[Dockel]

Dieses Video kriege ich nicht runtergeladen, auch nicht nach Anmeldung bei YouTube:
**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

Schaffe es nicht, dass JD die Links überhaupt aufnimmt.


Gibt es eine Möglichkeit das Video runterzuladen?

[pspzockerscene]

YT Threads zusammengeführt.

@Dockel
Du schreibst zwar, dass das Video auch nach Anmeldung nicht runtergeladen werden könnte, aber genau das ist die Lösung:
1. Einen YT Account, mit Berechtigung, altersbeschränkte Videos zu schauen, in den JD Accountmanager einfügen.
2. Video erneut hinzufügen - nun sollte es ladbar sein.

Falls das auch mit aktivem YT Account in JD nicht klappt, benötige ich einen debug-log:

Please post your log-ID here
If your report is about a specific website which JD supports via plugin, please also provide example URLs which can be used to reproduce the issue you are having.
If your report is related to a login specific problem with a plugin supported website, enable debug mode before creating logs, see previously linked instructions.

Bitte poste deine Log-ID hier.
Falls dein Problem ein Problem mit einer Webseite ist, die per Plugin unterstützt wird, stelle bitte zusätzlich Testlinks zur Verfügung, mit denen sich dein Problem nachstellen lässt.
Geht es um einen nicht funktionierenden Account-Login, aktiviere vor dem Erstellen deines Logs den debug Modus (siehe zuvor verlinkte Anleitung).

-psp-

[Dockel]

in den JD Accountmanager einfügen.

Wie macht man das? Vermutlich hier irgendwie:

[Jiaz]

@Dockel: Siehe https://support.jdownloader.org/de/k...n-instructions
Oder eben bei "Click here for instructions"

[Dockel]

Ja, vielen Dank, das hatte ich schon gesehen, aber das sah mir gar nicht nach dem Zufügen eines YouTube-Kontos in den JD Accountmanager aus (dachte, man gibt einfach etwa einen Kontonamen und Passwort ein). Vor allem auch wegen des sehr groß wirkenden Umfangs / Aufwands, der erforderlich scheint.

[Jiaz]

@Dockel: Ist die allgemeine Anleitung für alle Cookie Logins, wie es auch bei Google/Youtube der Fall ist, da hier der Account Login so komplex/gesichert ist, das der Mehraufwand nicht lohnt, wenn ein simples Cookie Import es auch zuverlässig tut

[Dockel]

Okay, verstehe, dankesehr!

[pspzockerscene]

@JDmurphy
The bugfix Jiaz has mentioned has been released.

@hawk
Your suggestion has been implemented.
You can use the new property "@ID" or "ATID" now, see YT plugin settings.

[Taupan]

Hallo,
Ist es möglich beim Youtube-Download mit JDownloader auch
das Datum des Youtube-Uploads in den Dateinamen des Downloads automatisch zu übernehmen, damit man das nicht manuell nachtragen muss, wenn der Download mit Jdownload erfolgt ist?

Danke im voraus für eine Antwort.

[pspzockerscene]

YT Threads zusammengeführt.

@Taupan
Ja, siehe Einstellungen -.> Plugins -> YT -> Hier ein entsprechendes Dateinamensmuster setzen.

[Perene]

Youtube cookies = not working for Flag Cookies, saying invalid.

Can we use private mode from Edge to create these?

[pspzockerscene]

Originally Posted by Perene

Youtube cookies = not working for Flag Cookies, saying invalid.

Works fine here.
Did you also test it via "EditThisCookie" addon?
Which browser did you use for testing?

Originally Posted by Perene

Can we use private mode from Edge to create these?

Sure, should work.

[goaliedude3919]

Whenever I download subtitles from YT, it's always the auto-generated subtitles that YT creates. Jdownloader labels the subtitle as "Subtitle: English [Speech2Text]". Is there any way for Jdownloader to get the subtitles that are user uploaded instead of the auto-generated ones?

[enjikari]

I feel like utter trash for posting specific video(s) help but.. I've been trying to download two videos (from two different channels/creators) and for some reason the highest (or only?) FPS variants I can find are 24 FPS. Which is odd, because 99.9999% of any/all other videos I pull from YT have 60 FPS variants. I'll post the links below. Help, and thanks in advance!

watch?v=R7UikzYdgTc

watch?v=ihvG3RgbYzE

[Jiaz]

@enjikari: and what makes you think those videos offer 60fps when even in browser 60fps is not offered? one has 24fps, the other 25fps. you can simply playback the video and rightclick "show stats for nerds".

[enjikari]

Originally Posted by Jiaz

@enjikari: and what makes you think those videos offer 60fps when even in browser 60fps is not offered? one has 24fps, the other 25fps. you can simply playback the video and rightclick "show stats for nerds".

Well. Don't I feel like a dummy. I didn't even check the SFD section. My apologies, and thank you for the insight. Feel free to delete my post(s), or leave them for possible future lessons. Thanks again.

[Jiaz]

@enjikari: all good, you're not the first one to ask and for sure won't be the last one

[pspzockerscene]

Merged YT threads.

@goaliedude3919
Please provide example links.

[Jiaz]

@goaliedude3919: by default JDownloader should prefer real subtitles as you can setup in Settings->Advanced Settings->"youtube subtitle" without "
Please provide example links

[hawk]

Hello,

Channel crawler stopped getting the newest videos from channels. It starts from the second newest video. When the crawler max items limit is set to 1, it doesn't get anything, and when it is set to 3, it gets the 2nd and 3rd newest videos. I haven't changed the other plugin settings.

Copying the links of the newest videos directly works fine.

[Jiaz]

@hawk: will be fixed with next update. thanks for the report

[hawk]

Originally Posted by Jiaz

@hawk: will be fixed with next update. thanks for the report

Thank you. Just for the record, I've installed an update (#48254) but the issue seems to persist.

[Jiaz]

@hawk: changes are not live yet, sorry for waiting. later today