JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #5181  
Old 03.09.2022, 10:51
TheOne TheOne is offline
Wind Gust
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 41
Default

Yup, back to 70KB/s again ����
Reply With Quote
  #5182  
Old 03.09.2022, 12:13
TheRenegadist TheRenegadist is offline
DSL Light User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 32
Default

Is this a case of YouTube being on the ball and forcing out another update or is this a JDownloader specific issue?
Reply With Quote
  #5183  
Old 03.09.2022, 12:53
Templayer Templayer is offline
Junior Loader
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 12
Default

And today... the youtube limits are back, with a vengeance!

**External links are only visible to Support Staff**...



(the only personal information the image contains is the names of my volumes and folders, which I couldn't give more of a damn about... so don't delete the links from this post for that reason like last time, thank you!)

EDIT: PS: I always download only one video from youtube at a time, but due to this limitation I have to force multiple ones (overriding my rules). Just saying, because I heard that people downloading multiple youtube videos en masse with JDownloader is the very reason Youtube is now limiting the speeds...

Last edited by Templayer; 03.09.2022 at 12:56.
Reply With Quote
  #5184  
Old 03.09.2022, 13:00
fuknuckle fuknuckle is offline
Black Hole
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 253
Default

as others are reporting...

slow speed. I am only downloading one video at the time I am reporting but since others are mentioning, I have no doubt it is widespread.

as for the issue of each video being put into it's own package, I thought it might have something to do with the "Customized Packagename" feature in the plugin options. thinking that was new because I never noticed it before, I loaded JD from a backup before the update to see if it had it there before and it was. so why now is JD putting all my YT videos in their own separate package after the update when it never did that before???

so in the updated JD I tried leaving that field blank but it defaults to VIDEO_NAME even though it is empty. I tried entering "Various Files" but it just creates a new Various Files package rather than use the existing and I tried entering "null" but that just creates a package called null....

at first it was annoying but now it is starting to aggravate me and the fact that it is also effecting twitter videos for which the twitter plugin doesn't even have that option... idk.... I do not want to use that feature. I want it disabled. I want all my YT and twitter videos to go into the existing Various Files package where they have always gone and where they belong.

anyways, please @Jiaz and team if you could kindly fix the speed issue once again and fix the package placement issue, it would be much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #5185  
Old 03.09.2022, 15:07
maxx_twain maxx_twain is offline
Modem User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: France
Posts: 3
Default

Hi,

Yes I confirm, Youtube is again limited to 50kb/s on average.
Reply With Quote
  #5186  
Old 03.09.2022, 16:47
Lemurian1897 Lemurian1897 is offline
Modem User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
@thorsten: siehe
Siehe **External links are only visible to Support Staff**...
Tja...nach einem Update gings tatsächlich wieder gewohnt schnell aber offensichtlich, ich spekuliere jetzt mal, hat Youtube es wieder geändert denn jetzt auf einmal läuft es wieder langsam. 9 Minuten für ein 40 MB Großes Video. Ich nehme mal an wenn es so schnell wieder außer Kraft gesetzt wurde von Youtube werdet ihr euch bestimmt nicht nochmal die Mühe machen das wieder rückgängig zu machen wenns nur ein paar Tage hält oder?
Reply With Quote
  #5187  
Old 03.09.2022, 17:11
pspzockerscene's Avatar
pspzockerscene pspzockerscene is offline
Community Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deutschland
Posts: 70,780
Default

Bitte abwarten das Problem ist bekannt und wir bieten am Wochenende idR. keinen Support.

We are aware of the issue and it will be worked on next week.
We're usually not providing support over the weekend...
__________________
JD Supporter, Plugin Dev. & Community Manager

Erste Schritte & Tutorials || JDownloader 2 Setup Download
Spoiler:

A users' JD crashes and the first thing to ask is:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
Do you have Nero installed?
Reply With Quote
  #5188  
Old 03.09.2022, 19:07
JDmurphy JDmurphy is offline
Fibre Channel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
Wrong wording on "force plugin updates". They are not forced but normal plugin updates can be downloaded/installed/applied in background/without restart if there is no pending core update waiting for installation.
The wording "normal plugin updates can be downloaded/installed/applied" sounds like a manual user action, while "small plugin updates are sometimes auto-installed in the background without any notification" is strikingly similar to "it's possible to force plugin updates silently in the background" except "forced" wasn't meant as in "required before the user is allowed to continue" but as in "pushed without any user interaction/notification". Sorry for that sloppiness

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
See **External links are only visible to Support Staff**...
Turns out my wording was so similar because that's exactly the page where I read the info


BTT ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
See my answers in text
Summarizing:

1. the fix is part of the core
2. updating the core requires a restart
3. the fix wasn't part of the youtube plugin so it needed no update

1. & 2. are the parts that I already knew, hence I wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
On August 29th (!) late afternoon, I noticed youtube dl speeds were back to normal again out of nowhere (...) and that without me updating JDownloader. So I assumed google had simply lifted the throttle, just like they did last time at some point.
... and this seems to be what apparently happened, because:
Quote:
I was still on build #46316 of June 26th.
... which means since August 29 youtube video download speeds were back to normal = unthrottled even when still using the old, unchanged build.

Here's one of the abovementioned screenshots from September 1 (maxed-out 50 Mbit/s line) for proof, before installing the update:



Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
Updates has been released on August 29 15:30 o'clock german time.
That's why I put a "(!)" in "On August 29th (!) late afternoon, I noticed youtube dl speeds were back to normal (...) without me updating JDownloader" to point out the coincidentiality/simultaneity

Thanks for this reply:

Quote:
There are several version of *player js* and when speed was low a new version got deployed that incorporates current date and also required error handling support. this broke our plugin and therefore speed was low. but it is one player out of many, so either the js (depending on the date) behaved differently and did not break or a new player has been deployed or the the video was using a different/working player.
Due to lack of specific knowledge I stumbled over "this broke our plugin" tho, since you said earlier "the fixed function is not part of the plugin".
Are you still referring to the youtube plugin, or another one? Or do I have to read it as:
"Due to changes in the player.js library the JD youtube plugin wasn't working properly, and a core function had to be fixed to make the plugin work again while fixing the plugin itself wasn't required."
?

Please just ignore that whole section/question entirely if it's beyond the scope of this thread. The main point was to demonstrate how youtube video download speeds were back to normal again (for me and probably others) around the same time the update was released without installing that update.
Reply With Quote
  #5189  
Old 03.09.2022, 23:20
potove potove is offline
JD Fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 73
Default

the slow speed returned today(September 3).. :(

I made absolutely no modifications to my JDownloader2 settings.
Reply With Quote
  #5190  
Old 04.09.2022, 00:50
ThisMadWorld ThisMadWorld is offline
I will play nice!
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 1
Default YouTube Rules again...

Hi all.

First, thanks all developer to try to "fight" YouTube slow download.
Today, 2020-09-03 YouTube win again 700kbps and this week earlier, JDownload s able to download at 20mbps or more.

More people have money, like YouTube (Google > Alphabet) for example, more they hate to share. Even for rich share is criminal but stealing from others is completely fine. It is all same the rich who create the laws thanks to their puppets, the little rich, the politicians.

If I win the lottery, sure, JDownload will receive some money from me.
However, the probability that happen is like to meet an honest politician, so 0.00000000000000000000000001%.

Thanks anyway and hope to see a new update soon.
Reply With Quote
  #5191  
Old 04.09.2022, 08:37
goldensun87 goldensun87 is offline
Giga Loader
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 90
Default

I just downloaded a video with yt-dlp at my full speed. Their last update was 2022-09-01. Although JD did not slowdown until 09-03, it seems like the yt-dlp team somehow caught the problem early.

I had downloaded only 2 YT videos with JD on 09-01, and 5 YT videos with JD on 09-02, and all 7 of them, as far as I remember, had downloaded at my highest possible speed. Now, my current speed with JD when downloading a YT video was 70-80 KBps.
Reply With Quote
  #5192  
Old 04.09.2022, 10:55
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,128
Default

@All: Found the cause/change and we're looking for a solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldensun87 View Post
I just downloaded a video with yt-dlp at my full speed. Their last update was 2022-09-01. Although JD did not slowdown until 09-03, it seems like the yt-dlp team somehow caught the problem early.
Issue is caused by changed js script that js parser of JDownloader fails to execute.
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #5193  
Old 04.09.2022, 11:44
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,128
Default

@JDmurphy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
The wording "normal plugin updates can be downloaded/installed/applied" sounds like a manual user action, while "small plugin updates are sometimes auto-installed in the background without any notification" is strikingly similar to "it's possible to force plugin updates silently in the background" except "forced" wasn't meant as in "required before the user is allowed to continue" but as in "pushed without any user interaction/notification". Sorry for that sloppiness
I just want to make clear that we don't force them. They are normal updates that just don't require a restart and can be installed/applied in background so JDownloader can directly make use of fixed/new plugins. The only difference to core updates is that core updates do require a JDownloader restart but technically they are the same.
Plugins can be updated that way because the plugin system is able to load/exchange plugins without a java restart being required.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
but as in "pushed without any user interaction/notification"
If user does not prefer this to happen,then update settings can be customized, see Settings->Advanced Settings->UpdateSettings
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
Due to lack of specific knowledge I stumbled over "this broke our plugin" tho, since you said earlier "the fixed function is not part of the plugin".
Are you still referring to the youtube plugin
The bugfix was outside of the plugin, within another part of JDownloader. But without this fix, the plugin was/is broken in meaning of not working as wished.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmurphy View Post
The main point was to demonstrate how youtube video download speeds were back to normal again (for me and probably others) around the same time the update was released without installing that update.
Most likely because they were rolling out new player around the same day.
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #5194  
Old 04.09.2022, 12:05
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
@All: Found the cause/change and we're looking for a solution
Issue is caused by changed js script that js parser of JDownloader fails to execute.
@All: please wait for next core update
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #5195  
Old 04.09.2022, 12:16
fuknuckle fuknuckle is offline
Black Hole
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
@All: please wait for next core update
Excellent!

but what about the other issue?

https://board.jdownloader.org/showpo...postcount=5128
Reply With Quote
  #5196  
Old 04.09.2022, 12:19
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,128
Default

@fuknuckle: the packagizer issue is still in progress, sorry :(
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #5197  
Old 04.09.2022, 13:42
jdboy6 jdboy6 is offline
Tornado
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 239
Default

Amazing how YouTube is in a war against download !

They want so much to get "clic" on their website !

And in the same time, we are talking about energy and how to save it.

Thank you JD team for all the job you provide for our happiness !
Reply With Quote
  #5198  
Old 04.09.2022, 13:50
GeorgeCostanza GeorgeCostanza is offline
Vacuum Cleaner
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 19
Default

at least they're not as hostile as tiktok but yea it appears the end is near
Reply With Quote
  #5199  
Old 04.09.2022, 13:53
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,128
Default

Update will be available within next minutes
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #5200  
Old 04.09.2022, 14:13
Gregory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Funktioniert ja immer noch nicht das der JD die Gesamte Liste mit nimmt, wird das mal irgend wann was ?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:59.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.