JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02.04.2012, 17:01
Eamonn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RS premium poor speed

Hi I am having really slow speed issues at the moment, my premium is with Rapidshare which JD has acknowledged due to it saying by the file loaded through my RS username, my current speed with JD is a lousy 400/600 kb/s and when I use IDM or say a torrent I am getting 6/7mb no problem.

My current package is 50mb and my firewall is set up in order not to interfere and as its not an issue with either torrent or IDM. I was hoping someone here could offer some much needed help, so thanks in advance for any help given.

http://www.picfront.org/d/8ALr this is for IDM speed

http://www.picfront.org/d/8ALt and for JD

Now just in case I dont have both running just to show you the major difference in the speed

Last edited by Jiaz; 06.06.2012 at 09:39.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02.04.2012, 18:12
pspzockerscene's Avatar
pspzockerscene pspzockerscene is offline
Community Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deutschland
Posts: 70,918
Default

In JD you use 2 connections per file.
How much are you using in IDM?
JD always downloads as fast as possible, increasing the number of chunks (don't use too many, 5-6 should be fine in this case) could help.
Note that after changing this setting it is only applied for downloads which start from the beginning so if you want to use it for downloads you had already started you have to reset (rightclick->reset) them before.

GreeZ pspzockerscene
__________________
JD Supporter, Plugin Dev. & Community Manager

Erste Schritte & Tutorials || JDownloader 2 Setup Download
Spoiler:

A users' JD crashes and the first thing to ask is:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
Do you have Nero installed?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03.04.2012, 13:07
Eamonn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I use 2 also in IDM and the speed splits between the two 3.something MB speed for each file when I do use two, did that test just downloading single files just to show the difference in speed.I'll give your advice on increase file amount a go and see does that offer any improvement.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03.04.2012, 17:12
mariana11111
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'v got a same problem.

Edit: I deinstalled JD and installed it new, disabled firewall und AV, but I still have the same problem the current avg. speed = 30% of possible speed. If I use RapidShare Manager I've got a full speed.

Last edited by mariana11111; 04.04.2012 at 23:29.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03.04.2012, 17:55
KidIcarus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think I have the same problem. JDownloader + RS Premium while downloading 2 files with max. connections set to 1 I get ~1MB/s, downloading 2 file via Chrome I get 3MB/s (1 file at 2.9MB/s the other 90kb/s but I think that is Chrome related). Either a strange coincidence or some kind of new traffic shapping.

Edit: To be honest over more time the speed with Chrome also starts getting worse (but still better than JDownloader).

Last edited by KidIcarus; 03.04.2012 at 18:01.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07.04.2012, 09:57
Ramona
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Same here. JDownloader is ultra-slow whereas direct download with FireFox is fast as usual. It all started early this week when I installed the latest update.

I googled. Several other people have the same problem.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09.04.2012, 14:38
jotsaroop
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Poor Premium Speed

I too am getting the same issue. I have jdownloader installed on my mac and i believe this issue has come about since rapidshare's re-structure of downloading.

I have 50mb cable broadband on latest mac osx. Max connections is 5, max number of downloads is 2 and speed is 0. This is usually enough to get the speed up to around 5mb per sec. Lately however it may hit 5mb for a few min, but then slowly decrease to about 100kbps, 200kbps, sometimes i've seen it go down to around 40kbps and in the rare instance to 2kbps, but then it may suddenly pick up and hit 2/3mbps.

This issue doesnt seem to stick just to RS. I also have a netload account and find the problem exists on that too.

Please help :(
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10.04.2012, 05:33
+CRZ+
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Same problem here. I think we may need a plug in update for this...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10.04.2012, 18:23
KidIcarus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After spending my whole easter weekend with that issue I doubt it is a JD problem. 1 Download 1 connection with JD gives decent speed, same goes for a browser like Chrome. If I start another download the first one starts to get a bit lower and the second one stays at sub 100kb/s level. Maybe this is some internal bandwith policy, new rule, etc. I don't know. I tried 2 different PCs and no matter what time it was the speed was really bad compared to 2 weeks ago.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12.04.2012, 03:33
azocarbo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've also been getting non-maximum Rapidshare speeds recently. I tried downloading straight from RS in Firefox and also got a slow speed. Pretty frustrating after just buying 150 days of RS :/

Any suggestions on what to do?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12.04.2012, 15:19
azocarbo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is the reply I get from Rapidshare:

Quote:
There could be a lot of reasons why a download speed is not using the whole
bandwidth of our 800 Gigabit / Second servers.

Unfortunately there is nothing we can do on our side at the moment. We offer to
our RapidPro customers the whole bandwidth.
Please check it again in a few days and on a different time.

I'm sorry for the inconvenience you have with our service.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12.04.2012, 16:16
raztoki's Avatar
raztoki raztoki is offline
English Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,611
Default

reply to them saying you want your money back as its not as advertised. Other than that if its the same in browser not much we can do it about it. I assume its just one slow/over loaded server within there server farm. 800Gigabit would be total of there servers and not for each server.
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer
http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170

Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15.04.2012, 19:27
jotsaroop
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

but as i mentioned earlier, its not just Rapidshare, I also have a netload account which is also being affected.....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16.04.2012, 13:56
thecupu thecupu is offline
JD Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 167
Default

try increase number of connection to 4-8
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22.04.2012, 16:45
PhilBench
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guys, same pb here and somethin's fishy (plz Raztoki, read before hitting my face, remember, I am a cute toad)

To sum up :

- 100mb Cable broadband (you can drive my car if you're sweet..and blond..and with huge t.t.), no firewall - yeah I know but please try me...
- Rapidshare premium
- W7/6Gb Ram, quadcore
- JD set ups : 6/4

Up to a few days, RS at full power (yeah full, loved it). Now capped at 800/1,5 per download. BUT NO PB AT ALL on direct download via Firefox.

This issue is only met with RS. (I don't have a Netload ) Deposit, Filepost are OK.

And if I remember well, JD had some changes in the RS host plugin few days ago.
Or RS is capping JD by playong with the headers...just saying !!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02.05.2012, 20:39
PhilBench
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nothing has changed with today's update....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02.05.2012, 22:36
Think3r's Avatar
Think3r Think3r is offline
Community Manager & Admin (inaktiv)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,703
Default

In fact, I guess that Rapidshare "blocks" JD users. This is possible because we use their API. Only speculating.
Greetz
__________________
Bitte die Regeln lesen! | Please read the forum rules!

REGELN: Bugreports | RULES: Bugreports


Erste Schritte & Tutorials | Self Help Index | Read Me | JD 2 Beta - FAQ

Support Chat

Keep smiling, it's simple!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02.05.2012, 23:33
PhilBench
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wouldn't it be possible to change JD's signature within the TCP header, telling RS "I am IE or FF with multi sessions, be nice to me"...Just dreaming, you know
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03.05.2012, 00:11
Think3r's Avatar
Think3r Think3r is offline
Community Manager & Admin (inaktiv)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,703
Default

Dreaming, indeed.
Greetz
__________________
Bitte die Regeln lesen! | Please read the forum rules!

REGELN: Bugreports | RULES: Bugreports


Erste Schritte & Tutorials | Self Help Index | Read Me | JD 2 Beta - FAQ

Support Chat

Keep smiling, it's simple!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03.05.2012, 00:17
Xavyer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Try Chunks 1 and Download 1
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03.05.2012, 21:21
PhilBench
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yop, it works...but then goodbye multi download
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05.06.2012, 21:33
PhilBench
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Confirmed, this is a RS issue (even with their own RS manager tool...they "cap" the throughput when you download more than 01 file at a time or if you multi-packet it! So nice of them..... Guys you can put this one on Solved status, I guess
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03.09.2012, 08:28
PhilBench
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Good newz !! (Stop the press)
Everything back to normal, you can now download on a +1/+1 basis (more than a file and multi packet style). Guess this (voluntary?) regression been solved at RS..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:49.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.