JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10.06.2022, 12:22
StefanM's Avatar
StefanM StefanM is offline
JD VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 484
Default Inconsistency in LinkGrabber filter

If I just use one single LinkGrabber filter:

Example:



If that filter is enabled,

I see files of all sizes

If that filter is disabled,


I only see files < 1 GB


The numbers 5,888 and 6,139 are not entirely conclusive to me. If I select only one package name in the filter with a total of 2,778 links - 1,765 links < 1 GB and 1,013 > 1 GB -,



I still see 6,139 links (filter disabled), but 1,013 (filter enabled).
This means that the number 6,139 includes all files - including files that go beyond the search criterion.

While the number 1,013 only shows the corresponding files from the package defined in the search field.
Attached Thumbnails
Filter.jpg   disabled.jpg   enabled.jpg   Package Name.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10.06.2022, 12:53
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,286
Default

@StefanM:
I can understand the confusion! I will add additional colour so you'll know what number you are currently seeing
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10.06.2022, 14:58
pspzockerscene's Avatar
pspzockerscene pspzockerscene is online now
Community Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deutschland
Posts: 70,906
Default

@StefanM
Because you asked via mail:
If you want other users to see your screenshots you need to upload them on a whitelisted image hosted such as picflash.org.
Example:
__________________
JD Supporter, Plugin Dev. & Community Manager

Erste Schritte & Tutorials || JDownloader 2 Setup Download
Spoiler:

A users' JD crashes and the first thing to ask is:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
Do you have Nero installed?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10.06.2022, 20:16
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,286
Default

@StefanM: update did not change the numbers but in background I was able to optimize it to use less ressources/time
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:34.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.