#1
|
|||
|
|||
Account sorting in account manager
In Account manager, let's say I've more than one account for one file hoster (each with different download traffic left). Can you add an option to try to use the account with least download traffic available first?
P.S. I know I can add manual *Usage Rule* for a specific account but in that case, I'll have to update the rules from time to time. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Please use 'Usage Rule' and change *Distribution Rule* to BALANCED (tries to balance to accounts in group).
The order in account overview has no influence at all. If that mode doesn't fit your requirement, then we can add more rule methods
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the feedback but I'm not finding the BALANCED option in *Distribution Rule* menu. I only found RANDOM and ORDER.
Also, can you make a special setting in the 'Usage Rule' to set the *Distribution Rule* for all hosters? Last edited by Cyberavater; 21.05.2019 at 09:24. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry, forgot that balanced currently not available in standalone but only in developer mode as it's not finished yet.
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
That'll do. Looking forward to it!
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for your understanding and sorry that I can't provide a solution now
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Also, while working on this you should also add a feature that by which we can specify in usage rule not to use specific MultiHoster's bandwidth for specific (free) hosters (i.e. androidfilehost.com is free anyway so I wouldn't want my filebit.pl's bandwidth to be wasted on that, so I added a rule not use a specific account but after I added another (new) account I had to edit the rule for that well. So, along with the rule to not use an account, I'd like a rule to avoid using a MultiHoster altogether).
Last edited by Cyberavater; 25.06.2019 at 00:11. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I will add a *Disabled* mode in Account Usage Rules. That way you can disable all Multihoster
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks, that'll be really helpful.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Will be available with next core update
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Suppose I have two different Multihoster 'A' (debriditalia.com) and 'B' (Filebit.pl). Both Multihoster account can be used for downloading from 'C' (turbobit.net). While I can use 'A' for downloading with unlimited bandwidth but for a limited time (i.e. 1-month premium membership expiry date) I can also use 'B' for downloading limited bandwidth but use for unlimited time (i.e. premium membership doesn't expire before finishing bandwidth).
Can you modify the Account manager plugin to smartly choose the account (i.e. Try to download with 'A' before trying with 'B') Last edited by Cyberavater; 23.07.2019 at 11:39. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Place A and B in new Group and change Mode to Order, then JDownloader will first try A then B
no customized rules will now check for expire date as well
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin Last edited by Jiaz; 23.07.2019 at 15:11. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
settings > account manager > useage rule tab
add rule > turbobit distribution cell, ORDER. drag and drop account in the order you want to use first to last. save edit: guess i should refresh on old tabs before posting
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170 Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :] Last edited by raztoki; 23.07.2019 at 15:51. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Does that mean, JD2 will "Try to download with 'A' before trying with 'B'" without any *Usage Rule* (by default)? |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, it will sort multihoster and premium accounts by expire date when no custom rule exists
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks! Much appreciated.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
so if both accounts are are unlimited its random.
The backend doesn't know at the selection process how much traffic is left for each host that multihoster supports, until its run with canHandle function (some providers don't tell you until you try and generate a link even), if provider has information available and coders have supported its function within the plugin. but this is more a function of if account can be used for that host more so than most traffic left as it returns true or false. raztoki
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170 Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :] Last edited by raztoki; 24.07.2019 at 01:52. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
more or less, yes
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
So, if both accounts are unlimited it's random?>More or less, yes.
In that case, instead of making it random can you make it sort account by 'least bandwidth left'? |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
I will add support for this.
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Hello. I include this request into this thread since its purpose is very similar.
I would like JD to balance downloading files between all the hosters of the Pending Downloads list. I mean, if I set 6 simultaneus downloads and I have 2 hosters, JD should dowload 3 files from each hoster at the same time. Regarding configure Usage Rule feature, I have two hosters, one belonging to a premium account, but the other one does not have premium support by JD at this moment, so I cannot use Usage Rule feature. Thank you in advance! Last edited by ozelui; 14.02.2020 at 18:27. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
@ozelui
jd does have 'max sim dl per host' you can control globally or within advanced setting GeneralSettings.domainrules. these are not dynamic based on how many dls you have running with 'max sim dl' so might not line up with half as you are describing. But might be able to achieve what you want right now, though with some side effects, for example: when youre not downloading from the other hosts you can go higher than that value. in respects to account usage rules, its more so used for that specific host, not for managing downloads across different hosts. so useful for multiple accounts from that host, at the level of premium account for that host, multihoster for that host, free account for that host, free non account for that host. It gives user control over what gets used when based on users changes. Not sure of what you're trying to achieve, so covered bases.
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170 Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|