[djmakinera]

mega.co.nz unknownFileName (Bad packagename)

**External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**

[raztoki]

filename = 9T_レータイレータイ(v0).7z
packagename = 9T レータイレータイ(v0)

works fine here

[djmakinera]

Not work for me

TeamViewer = reproduce

Ok?

[raztoki]

once again caused by users bad settings
he has disabled link checking which is required to determine filename which is used to determine package name. so files add with 'unknown' and so is the packagename.

enable linkchecking on adding links you will get proper behaviour

[djmakinera]

Why every time enable and disable - The Link Check.
In some cases helps to quickly add many links in other cases gets wrong package or file names. this is not the best solution and not too fast operation

[djmakinera]

How do I add a lot of links quickly (without checking the status online).
raztoki - said Do Link Check = bad setting!

Where is a good setting ?;)

[raztoki]

I've told you before package name is determined by linkchecking functions.
I now just wasted what 30mins trying to figure out why your JD behave differently. I forgot that you disable linkchecking.

If you want all links to behave based on correctly been sorted into packagenames you need filenames to be link checked, or set by decrypters. Since majority of hoster plugins filenames are set by linkchecking routines, you need to have the advanced option to linkcheck ENABLED. For some hosters we also have decrypter plugins for say folder links etc, these decrypter plugins can also mass add links with filename and linkstatus set to true, along with packagename set. These Decrypter plugins which mass add links with known filenames will set links status to true so hoster plugins linkcheck wont kick in.

To me this is adequate, and proper behaviour! If you disable linkchecking you will just have issues going forward, no|missing packagename, or no filenames wrong, and or files sorted incorrectly. Its something that you have introduced via your advanced settings.

[djmakinera]

I am power user and I can change the advanced settings.
Please delete advanced settings, if they are bad and break everything!


Request faster change:

Analyse and Add Link
ON/OFF : Fast Crawling

[raztoki]

you might be a power user by the sheer volume and in how you use JDownloader. But doesn't mean you automatically understand how JDownloader works or comprehend advanced settings. I will also state that without linkchecking a lot of function in JDownloader linkgrabber filters and package customiser rules wont work.

My advise is to leave linkcheck enabled if you want proper function.

It requires a restart, so you can't do it with a checkbox say on the toolbar or option in addlinks dialog

[djmakinera]

Originally Posted by raztoki

My advise is to leave linkcheck enabled if you want proper function.

If one link requires - 1 second to check

1 link - 1 second
100 links - 100 second
10000 links - 10000 second = 2,777 hour


If one link If one link requires - 3 second to check

1 link - 3 second
100 links - 300 second
10000 links - 30000 second = 8,33333333 hour

1 link to check it one second or more?

[raztoki]

yes and no, most of the serious hosters have mass linkcheck you can linkcheck ~100-1000inks in a single http request and return 1000 links in in less than a second (most requests are less than 1second)

though most hoster plugins have one link at a time linkchecking routine only. For those hosts it will take time, but most users do not add 10 thousand links at once and doesn't cause that much of a issue.

Either you want functionality or you want fast link adding, in this instance you can't have both as one effects the other as mentioned.

[djmakinera]

Originally Posted by raztoki

add million 10 thousand links

It is not possible - JD2 supports only 100k links.

[raztoki]

errr million was meant to be removed before I posted.

but I've had half a million links before without problem, during one test I was running.

[djmakinera]

but I've had half a million links before without problem

raztoki - does not support, because as rightly pspzocker said JD2 is not a tool to rip.

[raztoki]

it's not, even though you use it like that. ;p

[djmakinera]

DJ Ripped :D

[raztoki]

not bad.
only using what ~600meg of RAM, 9.5 million not so bad.