[gosuphobia]

Jdownloader shows a "An error occured! (imgur.com)" and "try restarting this link (plugin outdated?)" message. https://imgur.com/MDO6xmq

Here's a few links that are showing this error:

https://i.imgur.com/jZpsBwi.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/GA7jWo2.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/21mFczX.jpeg

I have the latest update, 45992

[Jiaz]

@gosuphobia: thanks for the report, will be fixed with next update

[fripp02]

The files are now downloading after recent fix. I also had to add imgur account info for it to work. Now it seems that the file info is not loaded as the availability shows as 0/1 online, and file size is unknown. File downloads even though it is shown as not online.

[Jiaz]

@fripp02: I'm sorry but I cannot reproduce any issue.
Can you please provide example links?
Also please provide example link and a debug log
Enable Settings->Advanced Settings->Log.debugmodeenabled and restart JDownloader, reproduce the issue and then create a log, see https://support.jdownloader.org/Know...d-session-logs and post shown logID here

[fripp02]

I'm seeing this behavior with direct links to the files that start with "https://i.imgur.com". The gallery links show the file info, but these direct links do not.

https://imgur.com/gallery/RlGSKuc
https://i.imgur.com/9H3Lntd.jpeg

https://imgur.com/gallery/fTIVBtD
https://i.imgur.com/eiNCMlP.mp4

I don't know if this has something to do with renaming of extensions: jpeg>jpg , mp4>gif

30.05.22 14.07.22 <--> 30.05.22 14.09.33 jdlog://2020035302851/

[pspzockerscene]

@fripp02
Here is the explanation on why /gallery/<id> items and i.imgur.com/<id>.jpeg items can sometimes get different filenames:
The imgur.com API/website does (sometimes?) not expose the name of the uploader when accessing single images.
In your case, that gallery contains exactly one image and the gallery-API exposes the uploaders' name thus it gets set for the "child-images" of that item too and is later used in the default filenames.

Here are your options:

1. Change all i.imgur.com items to those "album" URLs so that our crawler will try to process them as albums first, finding the name of the uploader if it is an album
2. Modify default imgur.com filenames to never include the uploaders' name so that filenames are always the same. See Settings -> Plugins -> imgur.com
3. Ask the imgur.com support if it is a bug that in a lot of cases, the name of the uploader is not given when obtaining information for single images via API. Relevant API call:
   

   api.imgur.com/3/image/<id>

   Afaik it has always been this way and it's consistent with the website so my guess is that this is not a bug on imgurs' side but more done intentionally and/or a privacy feature e.g. if you only find the single image linked somewhere you can't find out who uploaded it and if you find it as part of a gallery you can find out who uploaded it.

I don't see any JD bug here...

-psp-
EDIT

Also I wasn't able to reproduce your reported issue and I wasn't able to find any errors in your logs.

[Jiaz]

@fripp02
@pspzockerscene
I also guess it's wanted behaviour. So you cannot *reference back* from a single shared image to a complete gallery without knowing the actual gallery link.
Another guess/idea is that you can create galleries and just link random images/posts into it. I just did some tests and found galleries where the images do have meta data on their own. So ppl just randomly upload images without any meta data and ppl *collect* or *include* them in gallery links and add their meta data that is only available via the gallery link

your log does not contain any issue. Please reproduce the issue/wait for issue to happen and then create the log
I could not reproduce any issue with the plugin neither

[fripp02]

Thanks for looking at it. That makes sense that they are hiding the user account that uploaded file. The direct link also bypasses imgur data collection, advertising, other things they want a user to see. It seems to me that they made some changes in the past 2 weeks because I never had to use the API or be logged in before. I think they want to verify people for NSFW images or make them view user agreement.

[Jiaz]

@fripp02: You should not have to use API mode. Website mode (default) still works fine here (tested with your example links). So please disable api mode and provide a debug log like advised, see https://board.jdownloader.org/showpo...92&postcount=4

[fripp02]

All seems to be fine now that i disabled API and account manager setup. Sometime during the outdated plugin I added account info and had a popup saying imgur users needed to add it. Sorry for the false alarm.

[Jiaz]

@fripp02: thanks for the followup. when you encounter plugin issues again, please provide a debug log like explained