|
View Poll Results: JDownloader 0.7 Good or Evil | |||
Good | 173 | 82.78% | |
Evil | 36 | 17.22% | |
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Poll: JDownloader 0.7* Good or Evil
Let us know what you think of the new JDownloader 0.7.
Leave thanks, complains,.. whatever you want. But do NOT expect support in this thread.
__________________
Last edited by coalado; 23.08.2009 at 13:54. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think it has defintely improved.
Obviously, Java is CPU hungry when it comes to lavish themes, but it's OK now. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Better than 0.5 or 0.6.
Still worse than 0.4 in most respects. So I won't vote either good or evil. But there is hope. Also, according to the "About" window, it' now version 7.504, not 0.7x. Which is sensible, once released for a year or more it is silly to keep a pre-release number (i.e. < 1). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
@topic: well, it has really improved and I'm enjoying it right now.... so I voted good. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The jDownloader 0.7 is one of the BEST software i EVER used in my life. I'm using Linux, but it always could be a little faster and have better response for commands, but therefore, it's still VERY VERY GOOD.
GOOD work!, keep doing! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
too many bugs, much slower GUI, went back to 0.6193
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
could you please name some of these bugs?
__________________
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
1. http://board.jdownloader.org/showpos...25&postcount=9
2. Deep unrar isn't working yet. 3. Slow GUI, not sure it can be considered as a bug, but previous versions (even nightly ones) was significantly faster. Also I don't like the time/date offsets in log instead of normal time/date. I can live w/o deep unrar and offsets in log and even with annoying GUI reaction, but not with "missing premium", so I have to return to 0.6913. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
1. http://board.jdownloader.org/showpos...25&postcount=9 <<< try latest nightly please
__________________
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I tried to download the 0.7 install/zip file TWICE from rapidshare, and it was corrupted with CRC errors on some internal files. :(
Last edited by rafi; 23.08.2009 at 23:29. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
new jd
I think the new JDloader is way better...the interface is much more freindly and just plain easyer to setup...I think some of the other features need to be some how explained...its a fairly complex downloader with many features... be nice if there was some better support on all of its various features.....im not totally sold on Java platfoms but overall the effort into this has been pretty outstanding!!!
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
This new version is good as always.more working hosts are added.Thanks JD devs:thumbup:
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
1. http://board.jdownloader.org/showpos...25&postcount=9 <<< try latest nightly please
404 not found |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
reconnection as well as some plugins simply don't work on Mac
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
This version is perfect 0.7 better than old.No cpu and ram stress,very very fast working and feeling.Only unrar problem think last update to be normal.Thank you very much everything:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent. Just a question. I filled this anonym decrypter thing that was outdated and it was solved almost instantly. The thing is that it hasnt passed in the official release through the update until today. I used jdupdate.jar and the button inside jd to update plugins several times. Am i missing something about the normal update proccess or it takes time? Not rushing devs, just checking how things work.
So i had to update to nightly, not a bad thing since there are some new cool features. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The first impression when using the new version is it loads a lot more faster than the previous version, and also I like the new way of updating process. But, the new JDownloader is using RAM like drinking water. I have JDownloader running (with window opened) for about half day, and it uses all my computer memory and crash. When I take a look at the Task Manager, I found that the RAM usage of JDownload keep on increasing nearly every second. The RAM usage also keep on increasing even it is minimized to systray, but only at a slower speed. The only way I can reduce the memory usage is to open up the JDownload window and then minimize it back to systray again.
Hope there is a fix to memory usage problem soon. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Well... I didn't have that heavy usage of RAM issue after using for about 14 hours (2GB RAM)... Problem is with the Premium accounts gets deactivated if for some reason I lose my internet connection for a minute or Just starting JD. Premium accounts wont login on its own. Worked good in .6.913
Other than that, I think everything is quite fine. also link grabber works even better now. and new update system is great. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I am new to JDownloader, just used 0.9.193 for a week and now 0.7.504. My OS is Ubuntu 9.04 x64.
I like 0.7 much better. Better GUI and now MU and HF links also work OK. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|