#1
|
|||
|
|||
Imagebam
I went to dl a group of images from IMAGEBAM.com... when I copied the link for JDownloader it stated DeCrypter Out of Date: Imagebam.com
is there a way to fix this during an update? Last edited by Jiaz; 01.02.2012 at 10:59. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Moved->Decrypter-Plugins!
--- Please read the rules of the Decrypter-Plugin Reports forum again and make sure to add all missing details so we can do our best to help you. GreeZ pspzockerscene
__________________
JD Supporter, Plugin Dev. & Community Manager
Erste Schritte & Tutorials || JDownloader 2 Setup Download |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The same problem here
(Sorry to post in another fellow user's thread, but since this one is already opened...)
I'm also having the same problem with imagebam. It was working just fine and after a manual update (87 new updates!) it stopped working. Maybe it was a coincidence? I'm using Windows7 64bit, Java version is 1.6.0.29. JDownloader version 0.9.581 The log section concerning the problem: ------------------------ Thread: 17 ----------------------- 17 28/01/12 9:22:10 - FINER [java_downloader] -> load plugin: jd.plugins.decrypter.ImageHosterDecrypter ------------------------ Thread: 18 ----------------------- 18 28/01/12 9:22:10 - WARNING [java_downloader] -> Imagehoster-Decrypter broken for link: http://www.imagebam.com/image/f95923150110194 18 28/01/12 9:22:10 - SEVERE [java_downloader] -> Decrypter out of date: jd.plugins.decrypter.ImageHosterDecrypter@1e0338f 18 28/01/12 9:22:10 - SEVERE [java_downloader] -> Decrypter out of date: 15731 ------------------------ Thread: 19 ----------------------- 19 28/01/12 9:22:54 - WARNING [java_downloader] -> Imagehoster-Decrypter broken for link: http://www.imagebam.com/image/f95923150110194 19 28/01/12 9:22:54 - SEVERE [java_downloader] -> Decrypter out of date: jd.plugins.decrypter.ImageHosterDecrypter@14b3950 19 28/01/12 9:22:54 - SEVERE [java_downloader] -> Decrypter out of date: 15731 ------------------------ Thread: 20 ----------------------- 20 28/01/12 9:24:13 - WARNING [java_downloader] -> Imagehoster-Decrypter broken for link: http://www.imagebam.com/image/e3ec50150491865 20 28/01/12 9:24:13 - SEVERE [java_downloader] -> Decrypter out of date: jd.plugins.decrypter.ImageHosterDecrypter@115e891 20 28/01/12 9:24:13 - SEVERE [java_downloader] -> Decrypter out of date: 15731 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
wait for plugin update, then it will work again
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Please why with this plugin the images are downloaded one by one separately in a different folder and we have to merge all these folders ?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
because the plugin itself does not know anything about the other pages and autopackaging can only work if the filenames are similiar.
when you copy the gallery link, it works fine and all the links come into same package
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
sorry to contradict you but it's not true for all galleries. I have an account on imagebam and particularly in this case the plugin dont work correctly for all my gals
Last edited by isandar; 01.02.2012 at 10:27. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
then please provide galleries which it does not work
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ok i'll give another link soon, but i have already open a thread about this subject :
http://board.jdownloader.org/showthread.php?t=27899 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
i need example links then i can fix it
the reason is simple the plugin finds all images from the gallery but handles each image on its own. so if the filenames are not similiar then the links get their own packages. if the links are similiar, then they get merged
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Here the link :
http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/gnbv...kd7lujiqrgbapq |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
i added a workaround for this to work in old stable, because in our next major version it already works as wanted, wait for plugin update
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Ok thank you so much. Another example :
http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/14o3...n4516dhjj8bzsw ( I don't understand why the links are not hidden on this support ? ) |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
are hidden or are NOT hidden?
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
If they would be hidden the images posted here wouldn't be visible.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Why external links are visible for all (not just to supporters) and are not hidden if you prefer
Like here for example : http://board.jdownloader.org/showthread.php?t=35324 Last edited by isandar; 01.02.2012 at 12:05. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
jD's board software has a white-list of domains for which the links aren't hidden. I don't know it by heart so I always post with "" when I use external links that everybody should be able to see.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I do not think it's appropriate to include imagebam in this white list but i have not to judge this. How can i put a link just for supporters ? i think using pm is the only solution in this case
Last edited by isandar; 01.02.2012 at 12:30. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Why wouldn't it be appropriate to show images on this board?
Encrypted links are always hidden. Use an encrypter. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Show images is essential of course but i think just that it would be better to accept in white list a host which is not used primarily for pornography that's all.
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Wikipedia also hosts pornographic material. Does it need to be blacklisted as well? Maybe it should be reported to the FBI.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Wikipedia is not used primarily for pornography you are in bad faith as always, provide links to prove it !
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Wrong attitude
@remi
Btw most of members on this board knows your total dislike for this kind of plugin but : How it is hilarious to see you rush to answer anything to sow in disguise discord or confusion, to try to spread your political ideas, to try in vain to destroy this kind of thread with your absurd and contradictory arguments to protect some strange personal interest, to use your teasing humor when deliberately you did not relay the observations about images plugins made on other supports like mine to the developers against the interest of all. I guess it must make you laughing hard. Hilarious, vain and ridiculous attitude, but also hypocrite and disrespectful for those who waiting for a solution that will never come with you but who don't know it ! Even if it's your personal choice and even if for another things you can be very helpful. Last edited by isandar; 01.02.2012 at 22:46. Reason: My taylor is rich |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
For the update it works now, thank you Jiaz
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
thanks for feedback
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
@isandar
Very interesting post. I like all those accusations. It tells a lot about yourself and it gives me the opportunity to clarify some of the issues you seem to have. I'm not vain, I'm just a simple customer who's trying to help you. Apparently you don't like my help. I think you're overgeneralising and I understand why you're angry and accusing me of so many evil things. I know for a long time that you prefer to use jD for downloading any type of file on the Internet and images in particular. Your French is too sophisticated for me. That's why I misunderstood you several times. The web translators I use don't grasp the meaning of what you write. Some of what I'm writing here I've been trying to explain in French, but since my French is just too bad you might not have understood it. I'm sorry for my bad command of French. I indeed don't like the idea of jD focussing on image sites because there are so many other and better tools to download images. I also understood that you don't want to use these more specialised tools. That's your right but don't accuse me of expressing my opinion. I'm using several download tools and jD happens to just be one of them. I use it for the typical file hosts like RS, MU (now defunct), etc. It's my personal opinion that jD is wasting too much time on features where it can't obtain a competitive advantage. jD's last upgrade was in December 2009. That proves my point. I don't think that my personal interest is strange and everybody should first defend his or her personal interests, otherwise you get communism as can be observed everywhere in the world. If you're convinced that by defending one's own opinion is a wrong attitude, then that confirms my theory why everything is turning bad on this planet and that we're in a permanent crisis. People gave up their self-interests in favour of some power elites that abuse their power. What else would they do with that power? Defending one's own self-interests is not hypocrite nor disrespectful for the same reasons I wrote before. You've never explained me clearly what you mean with that nor proven that I own these characteristics. To the contrary. I try to create transparency in all that I think and do. I just tell you what I think. I would be a hypocrite if what I think would be contradictory to what I say. This is typical for power elites but I try not to belong to one of them. I've respect for myself and that should be a good basis for showing respect for others as I do for you. Only people who don't have respect for themselves have difficulties with showing respect for others. When they get angry they start insulting other people. It's a sign of imaturity. Concerning the porn on Wikipedia : Please read "Wikipedia Porn Purge Sparks Dispute Over Adult Images On Wikimedia Sites" ("**External links are only visible to Support Staff**) and several other stories. |
#27
|
||||||
|
||||||
Quote:
* Here in your post n°18 you said yourself you dont want to help us : http://board.jdownloader.org/showthread.php?t=34931 « It tells a lot about yourself » « I know for a long time that you prefer... » ect..., are you sure that you are not my mother, you're not an FBI agent or maybe a Scientologist ? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And finally how it is hilarious to read you about « competitive advantage » with jD when we knows your ideas to remake the world, hilarious and i think very strange yes, certainly more interesting than a simple contradiction, Business is Business ! ...:biggrin::biggrin: Last edited by isandar; 03.02.2012 at 11:14. Reason: always my Taylor ;) |
#28
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Very interesting post. That's exactly the way I like it. It stimulates my study of the human mind.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Something I learned is that what people accuse other people from is a reflection of the respect they have for themselves. If you don't start having respect for yourself you can't possible have respect for others and their ideas. Everything starts with yourself. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I wrote what i think about your attitude and you understand very well what i said. Now i have no the intention to waste my time with a manipulator like you, so good luck to you.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Why would I be a manipulator if I've my own preferences? I've a personal, independent attitude which might be rare in the light of the increasing power of communism and other forms of collectivism that take away all remaining liberties of people. I don't see what's wrong with thinking freely.
I respect your opinion, but I want proof of what you accuse me of and you didn't give me any. Except for our apparent misunderstandings because of your complicated and my bad French you don't bring anything new to the table. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|