JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

View Poll Results: JDownloader 0.7 Good or Evil
Good 173 82.78%
Evil 36 17.22%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 27.08.2009, 19:59
funkymonk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Not sure what version i'm on, must be the latest one i imagine, and it looks great. Much nicer interface, and everything seems to be working very well so far.

Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 27.08.2009, 23:29
TechnicolorMan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry Evil evil evil

The damn thing won't install; it seizes up part way into installation, with a bad logo showing. I've cleaned out all traces of JDownloader, uninstalled Java RE 6r16 and installed Java RE 6r15. Still the same. Installation never completes. I run a very lean XP Pro SP3 setup with very few installed apps and this is pissing me off. I have gone back to JDownloader 6.111. Forget 0.7.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 27.08.2009, 23:54
pandarean
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hightop07 View Post
I just upgraded this weekend and now my netload premium account down loads are very slow. Not sure why this is but previous JDownloader allowed almost ten times faster down load speeds. Did any one else have same problem or maybe a solution. thanks

I have a similar slow download problem.... but with Megaupload and with no account.
In previous versions I could download at my maximum download speed (50 KB/s)... but now with this updated version i cant go beyond the 25 KB /s.... and with lots of peaks... certainly this is a problem for me.... i hope someone can help me with this.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 28.08.2009, 04:50
lightwave3d lightwave3d is offline
JD Addict
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: jdownloader.org
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redhatGizmo View Post
Evil Word is not suitable in any condiotion for such pecious piece
of work (which also comes free) thread has to be like "good" or "not soo good" btw 07 is gr8 improvment in terms of performance ,stability features , bugs , plugins , memory (only cost 20~ mb ram(In windows style) ..etc only thing i not much like is the new tab bar interface previous side bar one was more unique and pleasing to eye ..but a straight flush 10/10...:thumbup:
yeah! I too like the side bar.... but i think many didn't like it....
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 28.08.2009, 06:43
walataza
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy It doesnt work for me

Quote:
Originally Posted by coalado View Post
Let us know what you think of the new JDownloader 0.7.

Leave thanks, complains,.. whatever you want. But do NOT expect support in this thread.
It doesnt work for me..after downloading and extracting,and click the exe,it doesnt load anything,it just shows the square startup screen as blank and goes off.And when i try to update in 0.6,the update takes forever and hasnt ever finished.how do i go bout diz..regards
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 28.08.2009, 12:33
specialdune
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the new version is very nice, i did'nt recognize any bug yet, it's realy fast working and it's look wonderful. for me, there must be no other update, just updates for plugins so that all will work perfectly in future

good working!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 28.08.2009, 12:44
mas911
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Using latest nightly now, still one (randomly) of the groups of premium accs become deactivated after restart (haven't noticed "lose" of premiums during downloads as original 0.7 did though), deep unrar seems to be working as it was.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 28.08.2009, 18:36
JConnor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've voted for "Good", because the native GUI theme is much more responsive than to prior 0.6 version.

But I LOVED the sidebar design in the last version, it was a more comfortable than the current tab interface, because all "current window actions" are there. At the current tab interface I have to look at the top and button to find my desired action. Anyway, the new settings dialog is great to use.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 28.08.2009, 19:13
JUser JUser is offline
Fibre Channel User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 128
Default

Here's my 2 cents.

The interface at first glance has improved. Its very sexy.

The "Plugin & Add-on" option lacks description for plugins. It would be nice to see a description though currently most of them are obvious.

I am still checking it out, but so far it appears to be a great improvement in terms of speed.


Thanks for the great work.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 28.08.2009, 19:29
nitesurf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up Latest version

So far this new version is much better. The queuing arrows are back which I like but went missing on the past version. Some host file servers were working again. Download speed seems ok but not really an improvement. Hope it could be faster for it seems to be somewhat slow. But I wonder if an auto resume option was included here as I often have to manually resume those disconnected downloads.

Last edited by nitesurf; 29.08.2009 at 16:20.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 29.08.2009, 01:26
ericisderek
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Initial thought bad, but in fact good

Main reason for thinking it was bad was the awful Windows 95 appearance on a Mac. Then discovered (in this thread) that I could change it under the user interface settings (which I'd never had to do before). Now looks like a Mac app, so a happy bunny.

Previous version would not automatically unrar and this does.

Overall an improvement.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 29.08.2009, 15:03
Serag4000 Serag4000 is offline
DSL User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 37
Default

Nice release. I Love the new tabbed setup.
The "Continue" button defentily needs to be changed, Also I face ALOT of repaints on "Synthetica Simple 2 D".
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 29.08.2009, 15:40
antman48
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I voted evil. It's not really evil but it can act evil.

- Does not extract in proper folder => Lose files in thousand downloads
- It disables files for its own reason => When the pc hibernates for example it disables the files that haven't been downloaded so it shows 100% completed package although half of the download is missing. If you remove tha package whoooosh goes the download

Better less bugs than more features or gui improvement. These can come after the thing completely works.

You guys need to set your priorities straight. The gui has changed many times but EACH time there is a bug that if you input data in a textbox you might lose some data in another textbox. Why why why why ??? 100 updates and this still happens!
And now it is worst than ever in a different way! Why???

If the plugins and site related fixes worked in previous versions I would downgrade today.

Better the devil you know!
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 30.08.2009, 01:09
Herosi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Well, JDownloader is a good program by itself with a lot of good intentions, but its versatility tend to reduce the expected performance. In my case, I have problems not resolved since version 0.4.x pertaining to netload's plugin and download speed on determined hosters, inter alia.

In my humble opinion, JD Team makes a great constant job satisfying several new wishes, but I think that is reasonably convenient rely on a stable program, maybe procuring updates of the current bugs promptly.

I will continue supporting JD and please receive my sincerest congratulations.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 30.08.2009, 04:30
joder666
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I must say this version is way better than others before.

They fixed many problems with some server as mega-shares and others, but this version mess up with something very important, the download speed.
My download speed is around the 180 to 200 Kb/s, with this version it drops to 70 or even lower sometimes.

I really like the changes as i said but, if you're going to improve something don't mess up with something like the dd speed, every good thing you had done will make no difference if dd speed of the program gets that slow. I rather keep using an older version that doesn't have this speed problem or start using others programs like flashget even if it is not as good as this one.

I hope this problem will be fixed soon, i really like the new gui.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 30.08.2009, 14:09
remi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by JUser View Post
The interface .... Its very sexy.
Just for my research. Are you male or female?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 30.08.2009, 17:48
Mcnammara
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up It's marveeeelloooous ....

Marvellous ...
Extraordinarily good e great...

Thkz.



:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 31.08.2009, 06:46
MP2020
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Very good, no big issues, and I like the fact you can disable the skins!

Last edited by MP2020; 31.08.2009 at 07:49.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 31.08.2009, 19:48
ivanelmillor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jdownloader is getting better.
The version 0.7 I liked it.

Thanks and encouragement to the project.

Sorry for my english.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 01.09.2009, 02:35
onolox onolox is offline
JD Alpha
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 24
Default

Put the button of continue in tab linkgrabber in the top.

The soft is for sure inproving, keep the good work!
tnks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:55.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.