JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

View Poll Results: JDownloader 0.7 Good or Evil
Good 173 82.78%
Evil 36 17.22%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23.08.2009, 12:43
coalado's Avatar
coalado coalado is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,983
Default Poll: JDownloader 0.7* Good or Evil

Let us know what you think of the new JDownloader 0.7.

Leave thanks, complains,.. whatever you want. But do NOT expect support in this thread.
__________________

Last edited by coalado; 23.08.2009 at 12:54.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23.08.2009, 12:48
Slaninica
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think it has defintely improved.

Obviously, Java is CPU hungry when it comes to lavish themes, but it's OK now.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23.08.2009, 14:46
Gweilo's Avatar
Gweilo Gweilo is offline
JD Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 716
Default

Better than 0.5 or 0.6.
Still worse than 0.4 in most respects.

So I won't vote either good or evil.
But there is hope.

Also, according to the "About" window, it' now version 7.504, not 0.7x.

Which is sensible, once released for a year or more it is silly to keep a pre-release number (i.e. < 1).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23.08.2009, 15:28
lightwave3d lightwave3d is offline
JD Addict
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: jdownloader.org
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gweilo View Post
Better than 0.5 or 0.6.
Still worse than 0.4 in most respects.

So I won't vote either good or evil.
But there is hope.

Also, according to the "About" window, it' now version 7.504, not 0.7x.

Which is sensible, once released for a year or more it is silly to keep a pre-release number (i.e. < 1).
I believe it's still 0.7


@topic:

well, it has really improved and I'm enjoying it right now.... so I voted good.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23.08.2009, 16:37
Gweilo's Avatar
Gweilo Gweilo is offline
JD Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lightwave3d View Post
I believe it's still 0.7
...
Attached Thumbnails
seven.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23.08.2009, 17:00
tmi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The jDownloader 0.7 is one of the BEST software i EVER used in my life. I'm using Linux, but it always could be a little faster and have better response for commands, but therefore, it's still VERY VERY GOOD.

GOOD work!, keep doing!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23.08.2009, 17:04
mas911
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

too many bugs, much slower GUI, went back to 0.6193
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23.08.2009, 17:15
coalado's Avatar
coalado coalado is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,983
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mas911 View Post
too many bugs, much slower GUI, went back to 0.6193
could you please name some of these bugs?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23.08.2009, 17:33
mas911
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coalado View Post
could you please name some of these bugs?
1. http://board.jdownloader.org/showpos...25&postcount=9
2. Deep unrar isn't working yet.
3. Slow GUI, not sure it can be considered as a bug, but previous versions (even nightly ones) was significantly faster.
Also I don't like the time/date offsets in log instead of normal time/date. I can live w/o deep unrar and offsets in log and even with annoying GUI reaction, but not with "missing premium", so I have to return to 0.6913.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23.08.2009, 18:21
coalado's Avatar
coalado coalado is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,983
Default

1. http://board.jdownloader.org/showpos...25&postcount=9 <<< try latest nightly please
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23.08.2009, 18:40
rafi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I tried to download the 0.7 install/zip file TWICE from rapidshare, and it was corrupted with CRC errors on some internal files. :(

Last edited by rafi; 23.08.2009 at 22:29.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23.08.2009, 20:41
surenderer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default new jd

I think the new JDloader is way better...the interface is much more freindly and just plain easyer to setup...I think some of the other features need to be some how explained...its a fairly complex downloader with many features... be nice if there was some better support on all of its various features.....im not totally sold on Java platfoms but overall the effort into this has been pretty outstanding!!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24.08.2009, 04:46
jinsatoemo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This new version is good as always.more working hosts are added.Thanks JD devs:thumbup:
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24.08.2009, 07:46
only_up
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

1. http://board.jdownloader.org/showpos...25&postcount=9 <<< try latest nightly please

404 not found
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 24.08.2009, 07:48
only_up
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

reconnection as well as some plugins simply don't work on Mac
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 24.08.2009, 10:35
enigma007
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This version is perfect 0.7 better than old.No cpu and ram stress,very very fast working and feeling.Only unrar problem think last update to be normal.Thank you very much everything:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 24.08.2009, 10:51
codedash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Excellent. Just a question. I filled this anonym decrypter thing that was outdated and it was solved almost instantly. The thing is that it hasnt passed in the official release through the update until today. I used jdupdate.jar and the button inside jd to update plugins several times. Am i missing something about the normal update proccess or it takes time? Not rushing devs, just checking how things work.
So i had to update to nightly, not a bad thing since there are some new cool features.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 24.08.2009, 13:48
Yue_Hong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The first impression when using the new version is it loads a lot more faster than the previous version, and also I like the new way of updating process. But, the new JDownloader is using RAM like drinking water. I have JDownloader running (with window opened) for about half day, and it uses all my computer memory and crash. When I take a look at the Task Manager, I found that the RAM usage of JDownload keep on increasing nearly every second. The RAM usage also keep on increasing even it is minimized to systray, but only at a slower speed. The only way I can reduce the memory usage is to open up the JDownload window and then minimize it back to systray again.

Hope there is a fix to memory usage problem soon.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 24.08.2009, 15:15
abdmaster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well... I didn't have that heavy usage of RAM issue after using for about 14 hours (2GB RAM)... Problem is with the Premium accounts gets deactivated if for some reason I lose my internet connection for a minute or Just starting JD. Premium accounts wont login on its own. Worked good in .6.913

Other than that, I think everything is quite fine. also link grabber works even better now. and new update system is great.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 25.08.2009, 01:31
Harpoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am new to JDownloader, just used 0.9.193 for a week and now 0.7.504. My OS is Ubuntu 9.04 x64.

I like 0.7 much better. Better GUI and now MU and HF links also work OK.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:58.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.