JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

Go Back   JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH > English Support > Problems & Bug Reports
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26.06.2009, 17:46
guardao's Avatar
guardao guardao is offline
JD-Team
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,308
Default JD 0.6.193 - Don't puts NEW FOLDER when joins two folders with "Move into a new packa

At "DOWNLOADS" if try to join two folders into a "NEW PACKAGE" and with a NEW NAME, this do not happens, simply puts at folder download, inside of the first folder of the OLD Package

Thanks.

Last edited by guardao; 26.06.2009 at 18:19.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27.06.2009, 00:34
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,561
Default

can you better describe it? sorry i dont understand exactly what you mean
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29.06.2009, 11:23
remi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

I've tried to reverse-translate his explanation, because this might be a computer translation. What I understand is this:

When you use the "Move into New Package" feature in the Downloads pane, jD creates a new folder (with the new name) inside the first folder of the to be merged folders. This assumes that the customer has enabled the "Create sub-folder including package name (If possible)" option.

Reformulated: the packages are merged, but the underlying folders aren't.

Note that I haven't tested this, because I prefer not to enable the folder creation option. Could someone, who has enabled this option, confirm this behaviour?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29.06.2009, 11:34
guardao's Avatar
guardao guardao is offline
JD-Team
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by remi View Post
I've tried to reverse-translate his explanation, because this might be a computer translation. What I understand is this:

When you use the "Move into New Package" feature in the Downloads pane, jD creates a new folder (with the new name) inside the first folder of the to be merged folders. This assumes that the customer has enabled the "Create sub-folder including package name (If possible)" option.

Reformulated: the packages are merged, but the underlying folders aren't.

Note that I haven't tested this, because I prefer not to enable the folder creation option. Could someone, who has enabled this option, confirm this behaviour?
Yes, that's it.

Jd takes the first folder (at download directory) to put all the files.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29.06.2009, 14:09
Jiaz's Avatar
Jiaz Jiaz is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 79,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guardao View Post
Yes, that's it.

Jd takes the first folder (at download directory) to put all the files.
thats how it should work
files that are already loaded or loading arent moved! and jd has to take a new folder and therefore it takes the folder of the first selected file
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:05.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.