#1
|
|||
|
|||
Packagizer rule not setting download folder correctly
I may be misunderstanding the Packagizer rules syntax. My default download directory is D:\Downloads\Move. I want to send all Mega download to a subfolder D:\Downloads\Move\Mega, so I've set up a rule as shown in the first screenshot (Rule Settings.jpg). I've run the test option at the bottom of the rule setup with the url **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff** and you can see the rule says it matches and shows it applying the correct download path.
However, when I then go and copy that Mega url again for the Link Grabber to capture it, as shown in the second screenshot (Link Grabber.jpg), it still wants to download to the default folder. This link capture was done after the rule was created (it wasn't something already in the Link Grabber). I've even shut down and restarted JDownlader but the rule still isn't applying. Do I need to "Apply" the rule changes or something? I don't see a button for that. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
@loner0102: Packagizer rules are applied from top to bottom.
1.) Your rule is in middle position and after it follows the predefined "Subfolder" rule that also changes the "download directory" property and thus overwrites the changes by your rule 2.) you can use downloadurl - contains - mega.co.nz 3.) in case you want custom folder AND subfolder rule, then you have to disable the predefined "Subfolder" rule and create custom one with, eg clone existing and change to Quote:
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ahh right, makes sense, thanks.
I was confused because I assumed in the priority column, the lower numbers implied higher priority and they override lower priority rules. It might be worth adding to the description that all rules are applied from top to bottom. Last edited by loner0102; 05.10.2021 at 02:44. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
@loner0102: you read lower numbers as higher priority? so 0 is higher than 1 and so on?
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Yes. Maybe it's a regional thing. Certainly in English speaking countries and former British colonies, saying something is "Priority 1" is an idiom for highest priority (Priority 0 isn't used).
I would have assumed that's universal as that's the default in bug tracking and project management software like Jira, "1" is highest priority. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
@loner0102: Thanks for the feedback funny how ppl have different views on such basic things
I will think about a solution so there are no more missunderstandings
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
only in computing where 0 is first ;p
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170 Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :] |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I've commented that in the ticket too.
Though I must admin I only saw it after a few years that the packagizer list IDs actually user-visibly starts with 0...so far, no one has complained
__________________
JD Supporter, Plugin Dev. & Community Manager
Erste Schritte & Tutorials || JDownloader 2 Setup Download |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I think the word "Order" rather than "Priority" would be more appropriate for that column. Then there would be no ambiguity about how the rules are applied and the numerical order would make sense.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
@loner0102: will be changed to "Order" with next update
__________________
JD-Dev & Server-Admin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|