JDownloader Community - Appwork GmbH
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08.04.2013, 19:29
whismerhill whismerhill is offline
JD Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 73
Default MyJdownloader & privacy

hello,

as I understand it, "myjdownloader" will be a replacement for JD1 web interface right ?

my only concern is privacy:
So, beyond the initial connections steps, will all data transit through your servers or will a direct connection be established ?

In essence will all links & what's completed & what not, transit through your server or not ?

And please, to anyone who happens to want to post. Stick to the subject, I'm not here to discuss whether or not privacy should be valued or not. I'm well aware that nowadays, a lot of people just throw privacy out the window with social networks & all, I'm not among those people obviously, I prefer to keep to myself whether what I do is legal, illegal, morally questionable or whatever ..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08.04.2013, 22:48
pspzockerscene's Avatar
pspzockerscene pspzockerscene is online now
Community Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Deutschland
Posts: 48,758
Default

The service isn't even available yet so why can't you just wait.
Maybe there will be a full description of what is saved and/or what goes over the jd servers...

GreeZ pspzockerscene
__________________

Ad-free installers || Werbefreie Installer
Windows Setup<--JD2 BETA-->Linux Setup x86 || Linux Setup x64 || Mac Setup
-----=>Support Chat<=-----
Spoiler:

A users' JD crashes and the first thing to ask is:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiaz View Post
Do you have Nero installed?
That's true James
Quote:
Originally Posted by James
Die Leute verstehen einfach nicht dass nur weil man mit einer Waffe auch auf Menschen schießen kann dass ein Schützenver​ein kein Ort für Amoklaufide​en ist
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09.04.2013, 04:50
whismerhill whismerhill is offline
JD Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 73
Default

ho ok

sorry I was just wondering what was planned that is all
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23.04.2013, 17:13
coalado's Avatar
coalado coalado is offline
JD Manager
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,983
Default

Sorry for the late reply.


Short: yes - all traffic will pass my.jdownloader

BUT... - and now comes the tricky part. We cannot see anything. The traffic is encrypted on jd side, and decrypted in the webbrowser. As long as you keep your MyJDownloader Password secure, nobody will be able to ready anything.

We welcome everybody to check the security and encryption of MyJDownloader. Its open source, and there will be a docu as well es implementations in java and javascript.

We can see the commands, but no contents.

Example:

If the Webinterface loads the downloadlist, the MyJDownloader Server sees a "download/list" command, but NOT the actual data.



If somebody is interested in how all this works in detail, please ask.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21.09.2013, 21:59
drzoidberg33
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Would there be any way to rather host the web interface locally or will there be a plugin like the old one added to JD2?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22.09.2013, 07:40
raztoki's Avatar
raztoki raztoki is offline
English Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 16,216
Default

Appwork has stated that it will most likely come, as I brought this up with them when we discussed how the API | services should operate. But was not a high priority task, some in Appwork do not like the thought of point to point due to the support nightmare it will create (like under previous webui|remote interface). I was of the opinion you should allow point to point without the need for relaying data over centralised point, as you are leaving yourself with potentially picking up the data bill and single point of failure (even though you can multihome auth services). And my personal gripe with centralised system under the current setup, all servers are located in Europe and my Lag is considerable. Ping to euroland ~450-500ms, local (state-country) ping within my state 6-80ms, ping via LAN ~1ms.

Believe appwork has said the following, that they would allow point to point just after the existing framework becomes fully developed. Connections will need to be still be auth through/from my.jd service. But my.jd could be used for hole punching through NAT | firewalls (which I'm a proponent of from the beginning). Also if you want a entirely different WEBUI you would need to create it yourselves. It wouldn't be included into JDownloader Project unless it used my.jdownloader to auth. If you wanted to use a different API frame work for your service, you would need to create that API and maintain it going forward. You would then need to commit your API works, after review it would be approved|declined|changed to suit.

raztoki
__________________
raztoki @ jDownloader reporter/developer
http://svn.jdownloader.org/users/170

Don't fight the system, use it to your advantage. :]

Last edited by raztoki; 23.09.2013 at 16:40.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23.09.2013, 16:13
drzoidberg33
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raztoki View Post
Appwork has stated that it will most likely come, as I brought this up with them when we discussed how the API | services should operate. But was not a high priority task, some in Appwork do not like the thought of point to point due to the support nightmare it will create (like under previous webui|remote interface). I was of the opinion you should allow point to point without the need for relaying data over centralised point, as you are leaving yourself with potentially picking up the data bill and single point of failure (even though you can multihome auth services). And my personal gripe with centralised system under the current setup, all servers are located in Europe and my Lag is considerable. Ping to euroland ~450-500ms, local (state-country) ping within my state 6-80ms.

Believe appwork has said the following, that they would allow point to point just after the existing framework becomes fully developed. Connections will need to be still be auth through/from my.jd service. But my.jd could be used for hole punching through NAT | firewalls (which I'm a proponent of from the beginning). Also if you want a entirely different WEBUI you would need to create it yourselves. It wouldn't be included into JDownloader Project unless it used my.jdownloader to auth. If you wanted to use a different API frame work for your service, you would need to create that API and maintain it going forward. You would then need to commit your API works, after review it would be approved|declined|changed to suit.

raztoki
Thanks for the detailed reply. I've started using the beta version now and it has been running great so far.

Hope to see great things to come!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:47.
Provided By AppWork GmbH | Privacy | Imprint
Parts of the Design are used from Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.